In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Question

In some nations, industrial companies and businesses are encouraged to remove their infrastructures from urban areas to rural ones. In my opinion, although there are some advantages for local places to being industrialized, I think it will bring about many negative effects on those areas.

It is undeniable that adjustment about locations of industries and businesses will create more job opportunities for local people. The current state of rural places is that they have a large workforce but lack work positions. That could explain why governments prompt more and more companies, such as nuclear power companies, electricity ones, to move to the countrysides to take advantage of abundant human resources.

On the other hand, the encouragement of government also has many drawbacks. One commonly cited disadvantage is the issue of pollution. Operating industrial infrastructure in regional areas can harm the environment by emitting gas and poisonous chemicals to sources of water, air, and soil alike. As a result, local people’s health will be affected severely, so will the environment. Their infrastructures, furthermore, can also damage the natural beauties of the countrysides. Long piles emitting dark gas every day, electricity wires everywhere, and inanimate companies, all of them make the original beauties of green paddy fields, clear blue skies, or the shiny sun eclipsed. Therefore, I think the removal of industries will badly affect local people’s lives.

In conclusion, I strongly believe it is better for regional areas to be intact, which will not be affected by changes in locations of industrial companies from cities to those local places.

Answer 1

In some nations, industrial companies and businesses are encouraged to remove their infrastructures from urban areas to rural ones. In my opinion, although there are some advantages for local places to being industrialized, I think it will bring about many negative effects on -> to those areas.

It is undeniable that adjustment about locations of industries and businesses will create more job opportunities for local people. The current state of rural places is that they have a large workforce but lack work positions. ->The imbalance between the workforce and working positions has been serious problems in rural areas. That could explain why governments prompt more companies -> manufacturers such as nuclear power companies or electricity ones ->factories to move to the countrysides to take advantage of the abundant human resources.

On the other hand, the encouragement of government also has many drawbacks. One commonly cited disadvantage is the issue of pollution -> environmental issues. Operating industrial infrastructures in regional areas can harm the environment by emitting gas and poisonous chemicals to sources of water, air, and soil alike. As a result, local people’s health will be affected severely, so will the environment. Their infrastructures, furthermore, can also damage the natural beauties of the countrysides. Long piles emitting -> daily emit dark gas every day -> toxic gases with intensive rates, electricity wires everywhere, and inanimate companies as well. All of them make the original beauties of green paddy fields, clear blue skies, or the shiny sun eclipsed. Therefore, I think the removal of industries will badly affect local people’s lives.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is better for regional areas to be intact, which will not be affected by changes in locations of industrial companies from cities to those local places.