Some cities have vehicles-free days, when private cars, trucks, motorcycles are banned in the city centers. Public transportations like buses, taxis and metros are advised.
2,922 views
0 votes
0 votes
closed
Vehicles-free days, which are known as the time when people using public transport instead of their private vehicles, have appeared in some city centers. It is a fact that this policy contains a few drawbacks; however, I am strongly of the opinion that its benefits are much more significant.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that the occurrence of days with no usage of private vehicles is not an effective measure, in some ways. It is obvious that public transport like buses is nowhere as convenient as private means of transport like cars. Travelers tend to choose the latter form which helps them reach the intended destination easily and comfortably rather than hustling in the crowd to get a seat on a bus or a train. Furthermore, this policy is said to be a waste of effort when it is not feasible to eradicate any problems, particularly those are involved environment. For example, air pollution – a global issue, which is in need of long-term solutions, cannot be addressed properly with some car-free days.

On the other hand, I contend that imposing a ban on private means of transport like cars on some certain days has numerous advantages. First, by reducing the number of vehicles on the street, the amount of exhaust fumes discharged may be decreased dramatically. As carbon dioxide is the main culprit of air pollution, air contamination may therefore be addressed and the air quality may be enhanced greatly. Moreover, eschewing private vehicles on those days is said to have positive impact on the traffic system. If there are fewer people driving, not only can traffic jam and congestion be reduced but the infrastructure such as bridges and roads may also be suffered from less damage.

In conclusion, even though I accept that vehicle-free days have a few demerits, I am convinced that its merits, including improving the air quality and road system, are far more considerable.
by
5 points

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes
 
Best answer

Vehicles-free days, which are known as the time when people using[SC1]  public transport instead of their private vehicles, have appeared in some city centers[SC2] . It is a fact that this policy contains a few drawbacks;[SC3]  however, I am strongly of the opinion that its benefits are much more significant[SC4] .


On the one hand, it is undeniable that the occurrence of days with no usage of private vehicles is not an effective measure, in some ways.[SC5]  It is obvious that public transport like buses is nowhere as convenient as private means of transport like cars.[SC6]  Travelers tend to choose the latter form [SC7] which helps them reach the intended destination [SC8] easily and comfortably rather than hustling in the crowd to get a seat on a bus or a train.[SC9]  Furthermore, this policy is said [SC10] to be a waste of effort when it is not feasible to eradicate any problems, particularly those are involved environment[SC11] . For example, air pollution – a global issue, which is in need of long-term solutions, cannot be addressed properly with some car-free days.[SC12] 

On the other hand, I contend that imposing a ban on private [SC13] means of transport like cars on some certain days has numerous advantages. First, by[SC14]  reducing the number of vehicles on the street, the[SC15]  amount of exhaust fumes discharged may be decreased dramatically. As carbon dioxide is the main culprit of air pollution, air contamination may therefore be addressed and the air quality may be enhanced greatly. Moreover, eschewing private vehicles on those days is said to [SC16] have positive impact on the traffic system. If there are fewer people driving, not only can traffic jam and congestion be reduced but the infrastructure such as bridges and roads may also be suffered from less damage.

In conclusion, even though I accept that vehicle-free days have a few demerits, I am convinced that its merits, including improving the air quality and road system, are far more considerable.


 [SC1]Grammar error => use, formula: N + V

 [SC2]Expression suggestion: => center of cities

 [SC3]Grammar error:  be careful in writing precess

 [SC4]Expression suggestion:  “I am strong of opinion” is very weird to me, this sentence is not clear in term of meaning. => I strongly believe that the benefit would come over or outweigh drawbacks

 [SC5]Expression suggestion: the occurrence of days without usage of private vehicles according to some factors, it is not a effective measure

 [SC6]Expression suggestion: => public transport is not convenient as well as kind of private vehicles

 [SC7]Expression suggestion: Travelers is not appropriate in term of meaning, latter form is very weird to me J

 [SC8]Expression suggestion: => intended destinations, just use “ the” with determined noun

 [SC9]Expression suggestion: people are in status of be late, usually prefer selecting taxi or private car to reach intended destinations rather than hustling in the crowd at bus or train stations

 [SC10]Expression suggestion: ‘policy is said’ is in wrong form in term of meaning

 [SC11]Expression suggestion: Furthermore, policy itself is not feasible to eradicate any problem, particularly in environmental issue.

 [SC12]Expression suggestion: it is not real example J, review by yourself

 [SC13]Expression suggestion: on private seem to uncover the meaning

 [SC14]Grammar error: by is proposition and do not use it at  first of sentence

 [SC15]Grammar error: the + N use in case reader determine  about Noun

 [SC16]Grammar error: => would have positive impact

 

selected by
by
97 points

1 comment

thank you so much

Related questions