ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới

Lưu ý: Check bài viết với Grammarly trước để tránh lỗi đơn giản! Click banner dưới đây để check


Chúng mình đang tuyển CTV chữa bài CÓ TRẢ PHÍ - các bạn có thể apply ở đây: "https://forms.gle/cpVjgt2TggRyVckHA"
Website Chuawritingmienphi là forum chữa bài miễn phí, được chữa từ chính cộng đồng học IELTS.
Các bạn xem bài chữa mẫu tại "http://bit.ly/baichuaW-demo"
Đối với các bài chữa thiếu nghiêm túc sẽ được kiểm duyệt và BAN tài khoản của học viên đó.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

3.6k Bài viết

4.8k Góp ý

2.5k bình luận

110k thành viên

Some minority languages are on the brink of extinction because of very few people using them. Although people say that governments should protect this languages by money from national budget, I completely disagree with this idea, but I think this have some advantages. This essay will be discussed both of views before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

On the one hand, protecting languages is essential for each country. Firstly, many historical documentaries are recorded by using minority languages. For example, in Iceland, it has a huge collection of North Europe mythology stories, which are written by Runes signs. If local native languages was lost, scientists could not discover and analyze ancient civilizations as a result. Minority languages also play an importance part in local culture and identity, uniting us a community. Thus, when a language is lost, a part of the community and culture also disappears. This must be an enormous loss for each region, some countries are affected far more than others by disappearance of a language.

On the other hand, the government  should pour public money to enhance the standard living especially developing countries. For instance, some countries in the Africa, numerous citizens live under the line of poverty, they have not enough food to consume every day. Consequently, if governments spend money to focus on protecting local native tongues, citizens may be face with death. Moreover, healthcare systems need to improve in recent. For example, vaccines like covax-19 are ultimately invention during Coronavirus pandemic, which allows us to prevent the infection and save thousands of people’s lives.

In conclusion, even though minority languages should be conserved due to the significance of the languages towards the culture of a nation and its potentials to find out the historical context of ancestors, I believe that such funding should be allotted to other more important sectors such as healthcare and the quality of life. It is recommended that the government should allocate money from national finance to aspects, such as education or social welfare, that develop  countries, if it does not conduct, this might cause the chaos in society
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi trong Discussion bởi (0 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.

1 góp ý

0 phiếu

Some minority languages are on the brink of extinction because of very few people using them. Although people say that governments should protect this these languages by money from national budget, I completely disagree with this idea, but I think this have   despite some advantages it brought up. This essay will be discussed   dicuss both of views before a reasoned  resonable conclusion is drawn.

On the one hand, protecting languages is essential for each country. Firstly, many historical documentaries are recorded by using minority languages. For example, in Iceland, it has a huge collection of North Europe mythology stories, which are written by Runes signs. If local native languages was lost, scientists could not discover and analyze ancient civilizations as a result. Minority languages also play an importance part in local culture and identity, uniting us a community. Thus, when a language lost is lost, a part of the community and culture also disappears. This must be an enormous loss for each region, some countries are affected far more than others by disappearance of a language.

On the other hand, the government  should pour public money to enhance the standard living especially developing countries. For instance, some countries in the Africa, numerous citizens live under the line of poverty, they have not enough food to consume every day. Consequently, if governments spend money to focus on protecting local native tongues, citizens may be face with death. Moreover, healthcare systems need to improve in recent. For example, vaccines like covax-19 are ultimately invention  invented during Coronavirus pandemic, which allows us to prevent the infection and save thousands of people’s lives.

In conclusion, even though minority languages should be conserved due to the significance of the languages towards the culture of a nation and its potentials to find out the historical context of ancestors, I believe that such funding should be allotted to other more important sectors such as healthcare and the quality of life. It is recommended that the government should allocate money from national finance to aspects, such as education or social welfare, that develop  countries, if it does not conduct, this might cause the chaos in society. ( Too long, I think this sentence is not neccessary.)
Bài này mình đánh giá thì khoảng 6.0 đến 6.5, bạn xem lại cách dùng câu chủ động bị động, cách dùng của từ, và cố gắng sử dụng câu ghép, phức, liên kết mạch lạc hơn. Chúc bạn học tốt.

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý bởi (57 điểm)

Update: Từ 30/4 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm Điểm nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...