Most countries believe that international tourism have harmful effects. Why do they think so? How to change their views?

Question

In recent times, there has been much debate about national tourism have some negative influence.

I think that many people travel in a place which will make it become more pollution, maybe overload with high population density. Also, someone comes to another country with a bad strategic goal such as steal heritage, successfully utilize believe’s citizens to scam their money. You know, my country has many foreigners who counterfeited someone that they were stolen passport and can’t come back their country. They do with purpose is that hope someone can volunteer some money for them. Also, some foreigners take advantage of a lot of English centres to earn more money.

In my opinion, we have many solutions to transform this problem. Such as, the government should seriously restrict the visa period. If foreigners exceed demand for staying longer, They must enumerate their exact journey during travel. It would be better to control immigrants. Secondly, if inhabitants can perceive natives who have some serious frauds, we should immediately inform for police. After police carried out the enquiry, foreigners offend against law. So they will be punished by the government.

National tourism will very good without criminal, so we need to do something to develop our country with many tourists. Also, the name of our country will have more people know about many beautiful things

Answer 1

Chào bạn, mình đã đọc bài của bạn và sau đây là những đóng góp của mịn vào bài của bạn. Mình cũng chỉ là người đang luyện viết nên khokng thể chấm theo điểm, mong bạn thông cảm. Cảm ơn bài viết của bạn.

1. "National tourism" =>> Có thể dùng từ "Global/Universal/Oversea or Foreign" thay thế cho "National" b/c không sát nghĩa cho lắm khi paraphrase.

2."Travel in a place" => "travel to" bạn nhỉ?