512 views
0 votes
0 votes

The pie chart indicates the proportion of males and females who were captured from 1989 to 1994, while the bar chart illustrates the main reasons for most recent arrest.

Overall, it can be seen from the pie chart that the ratio of males arrested greater than females, 32% compared to only 9%. The most striking feature of the bar chart was the difference in the reasons of both sexes in six out of seven reasons.

While 7% of females arrested with no answer, only 4% of males do so. The pattern was repeated for public drinking. Females were ahead of males, 38% as opposed to 31%. When it comes to assaults, females outnumbered males, 19% with 16%. The pattern was reversed for theft, more males were arrested for theft than females, roughly 16% for the former and 12,5% for the latter. As regard breach of order, whereas the figure of males was 18%, that of females was only 12%. As far as drink driving was concerned, the same pattern was repeated, only this time the difference was more pronounced with 26% of males as opposed to 14% of females. Finally, both sexes have the same at about 16.5% in the other reasons.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

2 Answers

0 votes
0 votes

The pie chart indicates the proportion of males and females who were captured from 1989 to 1994, while the bar chart illustrates the main reasons for most recent arrest.

Overall, it can be seen from the pie chart that the ratio of males arrested greater than females, 32% compared to only 9%. (cut) The most striking feature of the bar chart was the difference (variations) in the reasons of both sexes in six out of seven reasons.

While 7% of females arrested with no answer, only 4% of males do (did) so. The pattern was repeated for public drinking. Females were ahead of males, 38% as opposed to 31%. When it comes to assaults, females outnumbered males, 19% with 16%. The pattern was reversed for theft, more males were arrested for theft than females, roughly 16% for the former and 12,5% for the latter. As regard breach of order, whereas the figure of (for) males was 18%, that of females was only 12%. As far as drink driving was concerned, the same pattern was repeated, only at this time the difference was more pronounced with 26% of males as opposed to 14% of females. Finally, both sexes have the same at about 16.5% in the other reasons.

You should use compound sentences and pay attention to linking words.

by
7 points
3 votes
3 votes

The pie chart indicates the proportion of males and females who were captured from 1989 to 1994, while the bar chart illustrates the main reasons for most recent arrest.

Overall, it can be seen from the pie chart that the ratio of males arrested greater than females, 32% compared to only 9%. The most striking feature of the bar chart was the difference in the reasons of both sexes in six out of seven reasons.

While 7% of females arrested with no answer, only 4% of males do did so. The pattern was repeated for public drinking. Females were ahead of males, 38% as opposed to 31%. When it comes to assaults, females outnumbered males, 19% with 16%. The pattern was reversed for theft, more males were arrested for theft than females, roughly 16% for the former and 12,5% for the latter. As regard breach of order, whereas the figure of males was 18%, that of females was only 12%. As far as drink driving was concerned, the same pattern was repeated, only at this time the difference was more pronounced with 26% of males as opposed to 14% of females. Finally, both sexes have the same at about 16.5% in the other reasons.

by
151 points

Related questions