2,456 views
0 votes
0 votes

 

The figure provided reveals the distribution of money for something in education in Britain by each decade from 1981 to 2001.

We can see clearly that there are three trends of spending in this period. Firstly, the money for insurance saw a regular increase with only 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. By contrast, the salary paid for other workers accounting for more than a quarter in 1981, followed by a decline by 13% in 2001.

All the rest of elements have common situation were unstable. For instance,after accounting for 15% in 1981, Furniture and equipment were spent only 5% in 1991, went up to 23 % in 2001 while resources were received 15% of money in the first period; then increased to 20% in 1991 before saw a decrease with 9% in last period. The status of payment of salaries for teachers also was similar with 40% in 1981, 50% in 1991 and 45% in 2001.

In conclusion, we may say that money for education in England often spent pay for teacher and insurance was at least payable component.

by
9 points

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes

The figure provided reveals the distribution of money for something(equipments or services) in education in Britain by each decade from 1981 to 2001.

We can see clearly that there are(were) three trends of spending in this period. Firstly, the money for insurance(was) saw a regular increase with only 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. By contrast, the salary paid for other workers accounting(accounted) for more than a quarter in 1981, followed by a decline by 13% in 2001. ( chỗ này hình như sai đó bạn) followed by a decline with 13 in 2001 )

 All the rest of elements have(had) common situation were unstable. For instance,after accounting(accounted) for 15% in 1981, Furniture and equipment were spent(wasted) only 5% in 1991, went up to 23 % in 2001 while resources were received 15% of money in the first period; then increased to 20% in 1991 before saw a decrease with 9% in last period. The status of payment of salaries for teachers also was similar with 40% in 1981, 50% in 1991 and 45% in 2001.

In conclusion, we may say that money for education in England often(is) spent (on) pay for teacher and insurance was at least payable component.

Mình chỉ thấy vậy có gì mình góp ý sai thì bạn cứ reply để cùng học hỏi 

 

 

by
1 point

1 comment

cảm ơn bạn rất nhiều.

1. theo như mình thì các câu 

  • We can see clearly that there are(were) three trends of spending in this period.(thì hiện tại bạn ạ vì đây chỉ là câu nhận xét thôi.
  •  The money for insurance(was) saw a regular increase with only 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. (hồi trước mình được dạy là có thể dùng chủ động bạn à, cái này chưa có ai dạy thêm nên chưa rõ lắm. sẽ ngâm cứu tiếp :v)

2. Furniture and equipment were spent(wasted) only 5% in 1991, went up to 23 % in 2001 ( mình e là không dùng waste được vì mang tính negative hơn, mà ở đây không rõ là có negative không, họ mua thêm hay sửa chữa...)

3.hình như spend in thì hợp lý hơn spend on, không thì thui.

heart dù sao cũng rất cảm ơn bạn góp ý.Mong là trao đổi thường xuyên hơn để cùng tiến bộ nha.

Best wishes for you.

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
Giauyen2000 asked Aug 14, 2020
Giauyen2000 asked Aug 14, 2020
by Giauyen2000
0 points
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
Phuong Anh-DA asked Aug 25, 2020
Phuong Anh-DA asked Aug 25, 2020
by Phuong Anh-DA
0 points
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
nthao9987 asked Apr 13, 2020
nthao9987 asked Apr 13, 2020
by nthao9987
2 points
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers