Tax on Private Schools Should Not Be Paid [closed]

Question

Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
========================================================

Governments hold the responsibility to boost the country's education system. Thus, many people claim the tax that parent should pay when they bring their kids to private school as its long term benefits will be directed to the nation itself. However, I totally disagree to this view due to some reasons.

To begin with, private school's role has not been only as an education facility but also a business commodity for its owner. On the other hand, it is a regulation for the customer to pay the tax of a product they use. As private school is a product for its students as its customers, the duty to pay the tax is hold by the learners' parents.

Moreover, government has provided free education facilities through state school under purpose to support the quality of education in a nation. As an obvious example, the government in Indonesia has provided a tremendous number of schools which are spread in all part of this country. Here, it can be seen that the aim to support the state education system has been fulfilled by the existence of that state schools. So, the reason is not strong to base that general opposite view for the paying tax regulation.

To conclude, paying tax is an absolute duty of families who send their children to private school despite the reason to support education system of a country as this responsibility has been guaranteed by the existence of state education institution. Then, it is highly suggested to the parents who are unable to pay the tax to choose state school for their children for free charge.

Answer 1

Nói chung đọc sơ qua là thấy bạn viết có nhiều vấn đề :). Tuy nhiên về tổng thể thì bố cục ổn và gần như đi vào dc trọng tâm câu hỏi dù đôi chỗ còn lủng củng và ko dc logic :))

Governments hold the responsibility -> cái này bạn ko có cơ sở để khẳng định thì đừng viết thế này. to boost the country's education system. Thus, many people claim the tax that parent should pay when they bring their kids to private school as its long term benefits will be directed to the nation itself. However, I totally disagree to this view due to some reasons.

--> Opening: ý của bạn là "chính phủ có trách nhiệm thúc đẩy nền giáo dục. Do vậy gia đình phải trả thuế khi cho con em đi học, vì lợi ích lâu dài nhà nước trực tiếp nhận". Đó là trong tiếng việt ha, còn khi xem xét ở ngữ cảnh câu văn thì mình thấy không hề logic. ở đây không hề có sự liên quan giữa 2 vấn đề, nên dùng thus để chỉ causality là ko ổn.

Opening mình sửa lại:

"Nowadays, many governments hold the responsibilities to enhance the education standards. Some people states that government should impose tax on education to boost it. In my view, however, developing education should not be the burden to families who send their children to private schools for the following reasons." (48 words)

 

 

 

Answer 2

Có vài chỗ như này

However, I totally disagree to with this view due to some reasons.
To begin with, private school's role has not been is not only as an education facility to facilitate education to the students but also a business commodity for its owner. operates with a motive of maximizing profits to its owners.
As private school is a product for its students as its customers company that offers educational products to the students, its customers, the duty to pay the tax is hold by the learners' parents. it is bound to pay taxes from the profits its earns.

 

Comments

Cảm ơn anh ạ.