Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and big companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
5,700 views
0 votes
0 votes
Nowadays, an increasing number of people believe that only government and large firms have entirely money and resources are able to protect environment. In my opiniom, any one could also do it effectively

It can not contradict that human activitives have the greatest impact on evironment throughout the history, especially the fast industrial development caused serious enviromental problems such as global-warming, greenhouse effect etc in the recent years. This means that human is the main reason effect on natural changes; for example, wars used chemical, biological weapons not only destroyed the balance of ecology, but also contaminated air, land , water sources in large areas.

It is clear that preventing negative hamanlity actions is the best solution to protect enviroment. If only bases on supporting from governments and big companies, it will difficult to reach good results, due to kindman lives everywhere on the world, each religion is influenced differences by local citizen. So, individuals need to paratipate in natural protection in steady of expecting others supply.

That is not to say that governments and developed firms do not pay a role in solving these issues. Governments that could across laws require the public must to have responsibility in environmental protection and thanks to media to raise their wareness of enviroment.These help people to idetify what they will do to prevent bad factors being harm to nature. Not to mention, large companies support both resouces and powers for renewale of enviroment relevant programes.

In conclusion, all of individuals, governments, agencies etc should hand in hand protect enviroment to have results better.
by
59 points

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

1 vote
1 vote

Đây là một chút góp ý về ngữ pháp của mình nhé:

Nowadays, an increasing number of people believe that only government and large firms have entirely money and resources are able to (wrong structure) protect environment. In my opiniom, any one could also do it effectively

It can not contradict that human activitives have the greatest impact on evironment throughout the history, especially the fast (should be rapidly) industrial development caused serious enviromental problems such as global-warming, greenhouse effect etc in the recent years. This means that human activities is the main reason which affects natural changes; for example, wars have used chemical, biological weapons which not only destroy the balance of ecology (ecological balance), but also contaminate air, land , water sources in large areas.

It is clear that preventing negative hamanlity actions is the best solution to protect enviroment. If the world only depends on supporting from governments and big companies, it will be difficult to obtain good results, due to kindman lives everywhere on the world. Each religion is influenced differently by local citizen so individuals need to paratipate in natural protection in stead of expecting others' supply.

by
23 points

1 comment

nếu bạn làm đề tương tự thế này thì bạn sẽ có những ý gì? thật sự khi làm đề này mình rất khó có ý tưởng, mong bạn giúp mình nhé

Related questions