It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Answer:
Many individuals claim that the authorities should only help residents in their own nations instead of helping others around the world. While it is true that we should provide support for local citizens, I would argue that it is also possible to provide aid for people in other countries.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the officials have to assist inhabitants in their country. Firstly, this option can improve dwellers’ standard of living. For example, the government ought to spend more expenditure on supporting impoverished individuals and the disable, which enables them to meet basic human needs. As a result, this action is likely to guarantee the sustainable development of the nation. Secondly, due to the fact that local residents are imposed tax, it is the government’s obligation to aiding them. If the authorities do not helping citizens, individuals may lose trust in the government and be not willing to make a contribution to national development.
On the other hand, I believe that governments can also provide international citizens with support. First, when people in a nation suffer from uphill struggles such as serious diseases and natural disasters, wealthy countries are able to send money and necessary facilities to assist those citizens to overcome the obstacles. If there is no help from rich nations, impoverished areas might have to face large crisises in this situation. In addition, developed countries could send expexts and cutting-edge technology to developing counterparts. This can allow those nations to dramatically develop their science and national economy.
In conclusion, while the officials have to concentrate on supporting their local citizens, it seems to me that they fid it possible to offer benefits for inhabitants from foreign countries.