Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?:
It is argued that government should spare no effort to diminish environmental contamination and housing problems so as to inhibit maladies. I completely agree with this notion on account of the negative effects these dilemmas have on humans’ health.
Environmental pollution, especially air pollution and water contamination triggers a great deal of severe health problems. It is obvious that air and water are humans’ most essential needs as people need air to breath and water to drink on a daily basis. If they are polluted, it may directly predispose a wide range of diseases such as asthma, reduced lung functioning or even lung cancer – to name a few. According to the world health organization, it is estimated that approximately a quarter of the preventable diseases facing mankind today occur due to prolonged exposure to environmental pollution. This emphasizes the importance of government in protecting environment.
Another equally significant reason is that housing dilemmas also have the devastating impacts on citizen’s health. House is not only the environment in which most people spend the majority of their time, but it can also be the source of large number of hazards. For instance, those who devote considerable amounts of time to live in poor housing condition, such as poor domestic hygiene which helps the transmission of disease-causing germs will be more likely to have a fragile immune system, hence easily get sick. Therefore, Local authorities must shoulder their responsibility to lessen such matters. As saying goes: “prevention is better than cure”.
In conclusion, environmental contamination and housing problems affect detrimentally man’s health. It is believed that it is government’s duties to reduce them for a healthier society.