Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for goverments to make it a legal requirement.
7,414 views
0 votes
0 votes

Đề bài: Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Bài làm:
There is a definite possibility that recycling plays an important role in helping the Earth to cope with environment - related problems. However, the idea that governments make it become legal requirement has long been a matter of debate.

In the one hand, legal obligations, in some circumstances, will help governments reduce quickly the negative effects to the environment. For instance, it is no denying that people will follow the laws and recycle their waste gradually. In additon, this method is, without doubt, one of the most effective and cheapest method so far because it do not make the authorities rush to run many environment - based projects.

In other hand, it is argued that sometimes people follow the rules just beacause of the fear of punishment or fine, not from their arguments. Teaching method is more likely to be the best way to solve the bottom of this problems. Furthermore, this kind of method will encourage citizens do exactly what goverments want in the most comfortable way. In the result, people, without doubt, will know more about their global issues and environment so that they are more likely to take part in more recycling programs to give a hand helping their countries deal with problems like global warming, earth erosion and so forth.

In conclusion, the environment is in danger more than ever before so we should use many ways that we have to save it. In my opinion, I think that both solutions have their own installations so that choosing what kind of method seems to depend on goverment’s policies and the situation of each country.

by
0 points

Please log in or register to answer this question.

3 Answers

1 vote
1 vote
There is a definite possibility that recycling plays an important role in helping the Earth to cope with environment - related problems (to curb environment deterioration). However, the idea that governments make it become legal requirement has long been a matter of debate. (has remained a source of controversy)

 

In (On) the one hand, legal obligations, in some circumstances, will help governments reduce quickly the negative effects to the environment. For instance, it is no denying that people will follow the laws and recycle their waste gradually. In additon (addition), this method is, without doubt, one of the most effective and cheapest method (methods) so far because it do not make (does ) the authorities rush to run many environment  (the environment) - based projects (phần này mình không hiểu ý bạn lắm)

 

In (On the) other hand, it is argued that sometimes people follow the rules just beacause (because) of the fear of punishment or fine, not from their arguments. Teaching method is more likely to be the best way to solve the bottom of this problems (problem). Furthermore, this kind of method will encourage citizens do exactly what goverments (governments) want in the most comfortable way. In the result, people, without doubt, will know more about their global issues and environment so that they are more likely to take part in (engage in) more recycling programs to give a hand helping their countries deal with problems like global warming, earth (soil) erosion and so forth.

 

Mình sửa sơ sơ, vì thật là mình cũng không giỏi lắm, chỉnh cho bạn những thứ mình biết thôi :) mình có vài nhận xét:

- Bạn coi lại lỗi chính tả

- Từ vựng còn chưa phong phú, mình đọc thấy giống kiểu dịch word by word

- Bạn coi lại lỗi ngữ pháp
by
9 points
1 vote
1 vote

There is a definite possibility that recycling plays an important role in helping the Earth to cope with environment - related problems. However, the idea that governments make it become legal requirement has long been a matter of debate. 

In the one hand, legal obligations, in some circumstances, will help governments reduce quickly the negative effects to the environment. For instance, it is no denying that people will follow the laws and recycle their waste gradually. In additon, this method is, without doubt, one of the most effective and cheapest method so far because it do not make the authorities rush to run many environment - based projects. ( mình thấy nếu dùng nhiều will, without doubt, bài viết của bạn sẽ k đc khách quan)

In other hand, it is argued that sometimes people follow the rules just beacause of the fear of punishment or fine, not from their arguments. Teaching method is more likely to be the best way to solve the bottom of this problems. Furthermore, this kind of method will encourage citizens do exactly what goverments want in the most comfortable way. In the result, people, without doubt, will know more about their global issues and environment so that they are more likely to take part in more recycling programs to give a hand helping their countries deal with problems like global warming, earth (soil) erosion and so forth ( k nên dùng từ này)

In conclusion, the environment is in danger more than ever before so we should use many ways that we have to save it (nên upgrade từ vựng lên chút). In my opinion, I think that both solutions have their own installations so that choosing what kind of method seems to depend on goverment’s policies and the situation of each country.

 

by
15 points
0 votes
0 votes

Bài này đã đc hai bạn trên sửa rất kỹ còn điểm theo mình khoảng tâm 5.0-6.0 còn theo band điểm đúng thì bạn đc 5.5

by
15 points

Related questions