Chao ban,
Bai viet co nhieu y tuong hay, cau truc bai viet ro rang.
Tuy nhien co 1 vai diem co the thay doi:
- The introduction "Whilst some people argue that cloning human in order to supply spare parts is immoral and inhumane, I partly agree with their opinion for the following reasons" does not really make sense.
- Avoid using "I" in your arguments
- "Whereby, if we could..." is grammatically incorrect. "Whereby" starts a subordinate clause and cannot stand by itself as a sentence
- The conclusion is too short.
- Language use is sometimes colloquial and not academic enough. But good effort!
______________
People have different views about cloning human. It is quite natural that people seldomly reach a total agreement on such a long-run controversy. Whilst some people argue that cloning human in order to supply spare parts is immoral and inhumane, I partly agree with the idea that cloning human for organs is immoral and inhumane for the below reasons. their opinion for the following reasons.
On the one hand, I could understand why people there are strong arguments against worry about the practice of cloning human. Firstly, there are religious texts and common ethics standard consider the act of harvesting body parts off cloned people cruel. arguments against it. In other words, the replacement of wounded body parts of someone requires us to murder cloned people. As a result, that action seems to be cruel and unethical according to religious texts. Secondly, people raise questions about wonder that who would deserve to should be cloned or to be cured by that method. Those who have a bulk of money, such as Bill Gates or Rothschild family’s members are deserved to be use the cloned body parts or those who save people lives..
On the other hand, I also believe that cloning human is a scientific breakthroughs which should need to be appreciated. In the first place, it It might cure many diseases and save lives. To clarify, as we are knowledgeable that For instance, cancer patients often face a long waiting list for organ transplant. Additionally, finding a compatible donor is notoriously difficult. not every donated body parts are available and comparable with patients. Whereby, if we could By giving patients a transplant the new hearts or lungs into patients from their own cloned body parts, science enhances their longevity and life quality. they would live longer and healthier. Furthermore, Finally, human cloning could offer infertile people an opportunity a higher chance to have their own biological children. Most people are infertile because they could not produce viable gametes, whereas this technology would not require viable sperms or eggs, while any body cell would do.
In short, I assert that Although human cloning offers a new form of medical treatment, brings beneficial influence in our lives, while it has been challenged by meets some ethical arguments which are hardly accepted.