Many people believe that the world’s most urgent problems can be solved by international collaboration. Do you agree or disagree?

Question

In the present-day society, mass media has highlighted the critical importance of the international cooperation throughout numerous enormous achievements in every corner of the world. Therefore, some civilians contemplate that the most emergent issues might be almost completely alleviated by inter-nation acts. I partially agree with this outlook and in this essay I will support my opinion with viable evidences.

There are some perfectly legitimate reasons for one argument in favor of dealing the most contemporary issues by diplomatic ties. The underlying root might be mentioned is optimizing overseas concerted efforts among many countries to have a comprehensive strategic approach to mitigate the unprecedented consequences in a significantly drastic manner. For instance, developed countries in the Europe, which is world’s prestigious organization, have supported mutually to overcome the adverse challenges in the financial crisis in recent years. Furthermore, some other international organizations founded by profuse nations over the world such as Unicef, United nations, Asian Development bank can help or aid the less-developed countries.

On the other hand, opponents of this idea would argue that the international collaboration is not always an idealized solution to every problem.  On the basis that each countries have almost exceptionally separate conditions related to weather conditions, terrain, population, culture, economic status, access to feasible measures for each problem will be nearly distinct. In other words, the gap between developed level and national infrastructure among different countries might be a major hindrance. The pressing issue at the present time which cannot be cultivated in the international cooperation is rigorous rebelliousness in the mid-east region despite the fact that the world make a concerted effort to prevent for a long time.

In my conclusion, from the above thorough analysis, both viewpoints have logical reasons to prove their rightness. I agree the position that international collaboration will bring a great number of benefits to take viable steps to deal the problem, but we should take into circumstances.

Answer 1

In the present-day society, mass media has highlighted the critical importance of the international cooperation throughout numerous enormous achievements in every corner of the world. Therefore, some civilians contemplate that the most emergent issues might be completely rid of by inter-nation acts. I partially agree with this outlook and in this essay I will support my opinion with viable evidences.

There are some perfectly legitimate reasons for one to argue in favor of dealing with the most contemporary issues by diplomatic ties. The underlying root might be mentioned is optimizing overseas concerted efforts among many countries to have a comprehensive strategic approach to mitigate the unprecedented consequences in a significantly drastic manner. For instance, developed countries in the Europe, which is world’s prestigious organization(các nước phát triển ở Châu Âu không phải là một tổ chức. Nếu muốn nói đến liên minh Châu Âu thì sẽ là "developed countries in European Union"), have supported mutually to overcome the adverse challenges in the financial crisis in recent years. Furthermore, some other international organizations founded by profuse nations over the world such as Unicef, United nations, Asian Development bank can aid the developing countries.

On the other hand, opponents of this idea would argue that the international collaboration is not always an ideal solution to every problem.  On the basis that each country has its own exceptionally distinct conditions related to weather conditions, terrain, population, culture, economic status, access to feasible measures for each problem is hardly analogous. In other words, the gap between developed level and national infrastructure among different countries might be a major hindrance. The pressing issue at the present time which cannot be cultivated in the international cooperation is rigorous rebelliousness in the mid-east region despite the fact that the world has been making a strenuous effort to prevent this for a long time.

In my conclusion, from the above thorough analysis, both viewpoints have logical reasons to prove their rightness. I agree the position that international collaboration will bring a great number of benefits to take viable steps to deal the problem, but we should take circumstances into consideration.

Overall

Good ideas. Astounding lexical resources. Minor mistakes. Good overall. Keep up!

Answer 2

tớ thầy bài bạn nhìn chung khá tốt nhưng nên chú ý về diễn đạt câu nhé
On the one hand; On the other hand,