Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Question

Communication plays a critical role in the evolution of human beings. the notion that  oral transmission is more effective than written language is a matter of controversy. A number of people claim that speaking is of benefit to conveying information and emotion whereas others think written language is more used in law or finance. I am partly in favor of the statement for the following reasons.

To begin with, verbal delivery using body language and facial expression enhances the ability to impart the idea and sentiment of the speaker. Let’s take presidential nominees as a telling example, by dint of giving a speech delivered with enthusiasm, firmness, persistence, they could get their message across far more successfully. Secondly, thanks to launching a variety of spoken campaigns, not only does oral language exert beneficial impacts on the economy of the nation, on the contrary it also expands the public knowledge of numerous issues.

By comparison, non-verbal delivery is prioritized over verbal format in fields such as law or business containing a myriad of the major documents. According to economic reports, nearly seventy percent of corporations and companies require formal writing in legal agreements or contracts. In addition, it is newspapers, reports, or documents that tend to be stored and utilized for a long time. Therefore, the subsequent generation could take advantage of them.

In conclusion, I partly agree with the dominance of the speaking format.  notwithstanding that non-verbal format is preferred in certain circumstances and, the oral one  plays a crucial in conveying the message. outweighs the former in most situations