Whilst many countries allow boys and girls to go to the same school, there are schools having only students of one gender. It is hard to deny that single-gender education helps students concentrate more on studying, it also prevents them from developing social skills with the other gender, however, and lead to behaviour problems in the future.
Let’s take a look at the positive aspects. In a single-sex school, there is no sexual distraction. Therefore, students will be less thinking of the opposite sex and be more focus on studying, which leads to better scores. Syllabuses will also be changed in order to have suitable subjects for each gender, which results in even greater concentration on studying, for example physics education for boys and music for girls. And since there are no girls in a boy’s school, that schools sexual harassment rate will decrease rapidly, which increases the reputation of the school. An education system that can improve both studying efficiency and the schools rank, could possibly go wrong?Top of Form
But this approach has its downsides. First of all, one-gender education means male students will have less chances to interact with female students, therefore they might have a social problem of communicating with people who have the opposite sex. Another drawback is that the idea of one-gender education can be backfiring. The main purpose of it is to prevent students from doing romantic activities. However, there is one thing that we cannot make light of, that is curious. The more it is forbidden, the more we desire it. Consequently, they are bound to be attracted to male individuals and might end up doing romantic activities willingly, which beats the purpose of one-gender education.
In conclusion, one-gender education has both advantages and disadvantages, and must be used wisely to have the maximum efficiency.
Whilst many countries allow boys and girls to go to the same school, there are schools having only students of one gender. It is hard to deny that single-gender education helps students concentrate more on studying, it also prevents them from developing social skills with the other gender, however, and lead to behaviour problems in the future.
Let’s take a look at the positive aspects. In a single-sex school, there is no sexual distraction. Therefore, students will be less thinking of the opposite sex and be more focus on studying, which leads to better scores. Syllabuses will also be changed in order to have suitable subjects for each gender, which results in even greater concentration on studying, for example physics education for boys and music for girls. And since there are no girls in a boy’s school, that schools sexual harassment rate will decrease rapidly, which increases the reputation of the school. An education system that can improve both studying efficiency and the schools rank, could possibly go wrong?Top of Form
But this approach has its downsides. First of all, one-gender education means male students will have less chances to interact with female students, therefore they might have a social problem of communicating with people who have the opposite sex. Another drawback is that the idea of one-gender education can be backfiring. The main purpose of it is to prevent students from doing romantic activities. However, there is one thing that we cannot make light of, that is curious. The more it is forbidden, the more we desire it. Consequently, they are bound to be attracted to male individuals and might end up doing romantic activities willingly, which beats the purpose of one-gender education.
In conclusion, one-gender education has both advantages and disadvantages, and must be used wisely to have the maximum efficiency.