Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that making efforts to deter climate change is pointless, and we should think about how to survive in this state instead. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this idea because protecting the environment is the best way to protect ourselves from any risks likely to happen.
In my view, finding a way to live in the mounting appalling condition of the environment is not a good solution. If we ignore the present severity of the climate and continue to contaminate it in many ways, the environment on Earth will become worse and worse. This could lead to a detrimental impact on all species' survival in the world, including humans ourselves. In the last 50 years, due to climate change, we have witnessed the extinction of many wild animals, such as rhinos, exotic birds, or scarce tigers, and other living habitats are also on the verge of being extinct. Just as with the gradual disappearance of Earth species, our green planet will no longer be a living place. Those aforementioned consequences have proved that trying to live in a polluted environment would not result in a glamorous future for humans, other species, and the Earth alike.
On the other hand, I believe that making attempts to improve climate change would certainly make our future better. The potential risks would be mitigated when we could take measures to deal with climate change. The ecosystem would not be destroyed, and this means that habitats of many wild animals would not be disappeared. About humans, our health might be better due to living in a fresh atmosphere, and it could lead to a longer life expectancy. Therefore, protecting the environment is crucial to help all of us have a better life.
In conclusion, I think that deterring the environment from becoming worse and improving it is a better option, rather than finding ways to live with it.