It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages
With the significant transportation development , scientists and tourists now have abilities to access the natural isolated area, which have never been exploited previously. I would contend that the merits for this evolution are outweighed by its drawbacks.
There is no doubt that travelling to the undiscovered religions offer supervisor benefits for both science and entertainment. First of all, the discovery of new places assists scientists broaden their horizon about geological, medicine. The newfound knowledge acts as a precursor to fostering human’s clinical evolution and provide such forward-looking insights in addressing serious environmental problems that humans face. Additionally, accessing previously unreachable destinations can satisfy the curiosities and passions of travel enthusiasts by mystical sceneries and exotic getaways.
However, I believe that there are obviously downsides of this trend that threat to the natural world. As can be seen that overexploitation are implemented to meet the research demand, leading to a devastating effect on natural habitat and ecological systems . For example, by the terrible extension of land forest in Amazon, half of wildlife creatures are on the brink of the extinction and “the green heart of the earth” was heavily contaminate. Moreover, indigenous population in this remote area are driven out by the “unwelcomed guests”. In fact,there are not any tolerances for local people if they hinder the scientists to protect their hometown ,evenly threat to their life.
To summarize, it is challenged to avoid the negative effects on the environment and local people when discovering distant religions . To my thinking, we should limit the accessibility of traveller and scientist to preserve the valuable specialities of these place