Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers. Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
It is believed that teaching academic subjects should be the principal approach of schools to prepare students for better jobs in their future, while alternative subjects such as music and sports should also be included in the curriculum. Both viewpoints are justifiable, but I personally lean towards the latter.
o On the one hand, academic subject indeed significant. In fact, it is the bulk of the best way to have a good career after graduation. Such as math, science and language, whose performance is placed heavy emphasis on education and employers alike.
o On the other hand, it is claimed that non-academic subjects cannot be discounted altogether. Having said that, they may not be directly helpful in securing employment, they indirectly make a candidate more employable. For instance, the person, who learn how to sing or play a musical instrument could bring benefits for students in networking events or have job promotions. Another compelling reason why non-academic subjects should be taught in school is that it allows talented student in athletic and artistic fields to be discovered. In addition to this, non-academic could bring benefits to students as they help them to improve their strength to work under pressure after a nerve cracking semester or they could expand their professional network by playing sports with their colleagues or partners.
o In conclusion, I reckon that academic subjects should be given precedence in school, but it is also important that students should learn another subjects such as music and sports.