Topic: Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary world, there has been a great deal of discussion revolving around the issue of animal testing. Some people assert that these experiments ought to disallow because it involve to moral issue, whereas many others argue that they strongly believe it bring a huge value to their life. Personally, I am in favor of the former view.
The prohibition testing on animal has much value in various way. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that the lives of animals should be respected. That is to say, God created creature and human to live an equal life, their own benefits to balance the ecosystem , not for being human satisfaction. The most obvious example is that there was a remarkable day for the history of animal tesing, in 2006, there was 8 person who volunteer to use a new vacine. As a result, for an over hour later, 6/8 volunteer almost died because of shocking medicines even the medicine had tested on white mice which their habitat almost like human. In addition, human have no moral right to do experiments on animals. For instance, they have done it to publish paper and do not bring it to practical.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied the valuable experimentation on animal. That is to say, many important medical discoveries involved in animal testing thus, it is necessary to do medical tests on new drug. Even so, the ban of experiment on animal is morally right.
In summary, I would concede that experimentation on animal brings huge profit to human. Despite that the prohibition animal testing is right to human being. Overall, I am convinced that it is better to forbid animal testing.