In today's technology-focused world, the argument of whether the educational dissemination of science-based subjects should be prioritized in terms of governmental funding, is still controversial. Although it is no doubt that the benefits of scientific knowledge for school-leavers are significant, the importance of the remaining majors should not be devalued in any cases . This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the idea of increasing resources for science courses cite various advantages from prospective careers which graduates tend to earn with scientific degrees ranges from bachelor to PhD. They point evidences from occupations such as surgeon or IT programmer, whose annual incomes are overwhelmingly high and encourage the youths to pursue. Another convincing reason is the contribution of science in the development and progression of a nation. It is widely observed that most developed countries where advanced technological and medical achievements are made, appears to be leading in terms of economics. The supporters take example form the United State and European countries and urge others to follow suit. Finally, the proponents highlight the pressing needs of science on the subject of counteracting worldwide ecological crisis and disease epidemics.
Nonetheless of all, the influence of other subjects on students should not be ignored at all costs. The critics of the aforementioned statements emphasized the educational role of art subjects in the well-being of student's imagination and creativity. A large amount of research (research là uncountable noun) has proved that children who regularly take part in artistic activities show good signs of intellectual and emotional all-rounded. Secondly, the opponents point to history and literature as they contend that those subjects provide a link to our roots and descendants should be well-informed of historical events and written masterpieces to show respect for previous generations. For instance, an American student would lose sight of his/her own national identity without acknowledging who Abraham Lincoln is. The last issue is the whole question of preference, it is considered to be impractical to force future employees to take up academic majors that go against their wishes. This perhaps due to the fact that not all students want to become scientists or the excessive pressure they might face in medical school,restricting them to carry on studying. If the national authorities were to allocate extra funding for science courses, learner in different faculties would suffer from poorer facilities.
In conclusion, personally I more side with the opposing view that the state should distribute funding schemes equally for the shared privileges of all scholars in varying fields. Despite the undeniable vitality of science subject in education, others should not be discredited for the complete growth of a country.
Góp ý xíu nha, nhiều từ vựng cũng hay nhưng bạn hơi overuse á, nên điều tiết từ một xíu để tránh làm bài đọc khó hiểu