Economic development always harms the environment. It is impossible for a country to both develop the economy and protect the environment at the same time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Question

Over the last few decades, many cities around the world have seen alarming increase in decrease the level of environment quality. While some people think that it is impractical for nations can be able to develop both the economy and the environment at the same time, I partly agree with this opinion because nations can take action on environment problems.

On the one hand, there are many reasons why it is challenging for governments to promote the economy and the environment concurrently. The most vital cause would be that if the governments want to have economic advancement, they accept bring about indispensable impact on the environment in certain level. To be more specific, it is obvious that there are many human activities serving the growth of national economy such as wood exploitation or the burning of fossil fuels or movement, resulting in the most serious problem: global warming.

However, the authorities have to be responsible and take action on environment issues. It is undeniable that there are many different ways for nations to minimize the consequences of economic development. One of the most significant measure is that government should introduce laws to limit the wood production and have heavy sentences for companies break the law. On top of that, reducing the dependence on fossil fuels is effective method. To achieve sustainable development, government can be able to allocate money in national budget to research alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power.

In conclusion, it is difficult for environment authorities can be able to completely delete the influence of economic activities to environment, however, through many different potential methods, every nation can cooperate in effort of reducing harmful impact on global ecosystem.

Answer 1

Over the last few decades, many cities around the world have seen an alarming increase in the decrease in the level of environmental quality. While some people think that it is impractical for nations can be able to develop both the economy and the environment at the same time, I partly agree with this opinion because nations can take action on environment environmrntal problems.

On the one hand, there are many reasons why it is challenging for governments to promote the economy and the environment concurrently. The most vital cause would be that if the governments want to have economic advancement, they accept bring about an indispensable impact on the environment in at a certain level. To be more specific, it is obvious that there are many human activities are serving the growth of the national economy such as wood exploitation or the burning of fossil fuels or movement, resulting in the most serious problem: global warming.

However, the authorities have to be responsible and take action on environmental issues. It is undeniable that there are many different ways for nations to minimize the consequences of economic development. One of the most significant measures is that the government should introduce laws to limit the wood production products and have heavy sentnnces for companies to break the law. On top of that, reducing the dependence on fossil fuels is an effective method. To achieve sustaiable development, the government can be able to allocate money in the national budget to research alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power.

In conclusion, it is difficult for environmental authorities can be able to completely delete the influence of economic activities to on the environment, however, through many different potential methods, every nation can cooperate in the effort of reducing harmful impact on the global ecosystem.

Comments

cảm ơn bạn nhiều nhé ^-^!

---

chúc bạn ngày càng viết tốt hơn!