Some people think that governments should use the money to provide faster means of public transport, while others concern that there are many important priorities than public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are several suggestions that governments spend money on faster means of transport whereas other people advice spending money on more essential priorities. To my way of thinking, the latter is worth considering because of its potential benefits.
Initially, although some public transportation nowadays is modern, they are not fast enough. The reason for this problem is that too many people use public transport, but they generally not insured or repaired. Therefore, some parts and facilities inside and outside the buses or coaches break down, and it leads to the slow speed which makes people unpleasant, especially when they are busy or need to go to the destination soon. Consequently, providing the money for fixing services for public transport can make the residents just take little time to use them and feel more comfortable as they are all faster.
Otherwise, I believe that alongside public transport, there are a great number of factors that must be spent the money on. First, our world has to withstand various kinds of pollution, such as air pollution and water pollution which negatively affect humans. Hence, the government ought to use the money to solve those problems. For instance, they can buy a machine that excludes toxic waste and chemicals from a river. Second, they need to provide students who study well scholarships to study aboard. Thus, they will be able to develop their countries quickly by the knowledge and skills they learned overseas.
To conclude, I think that spending money on public transport is necessary. However, the countries will benefit from the development more if they use the money on environmental issues and good students