In the near future,all huan knowledge will be available on computer.As this is becoming reality,there will be less and less need of teachers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As with the progress of evolution of humans,all the understanding and illumination of mankind are valid on coputer.Therefore,it has sparked a heated debate that the is no need of teachers in the classroom.In my view,I partly approve of this idea because computers are source of information for students ,while teachers serve as guides in the class.
In the first place,there is no denying the fact that computers are quarter of facts and handy tools to take in new knowledge.In fact,using a computer to compose essays or presentations now are far more quickly and straightforward instead of writing on paper for long.Undoutedly,students have all control in choosing online curriculums and relevent effects.Therefore,those appealing lessions interest them in lectures and helps them think independently.All in all,use those convenient tools show enornous benefits for students in general
In the second place,it is a common knowlrdge that teachers play fundamentall important role in guiding students.In class,teachers and students are peers that locate the problems in lessons and solve them together.Hence,utilizing computers without teachers will bring inherent detrimental effects.In particular,a student are racking his brain to do a math exercise,if there is any issue in process,computer will provide answers but have no guidelines,which needs the appearance of teachers to clear the exercise.Futhermore,that teachers turn up at class with students create cozy and friendly environment rather than only students with unconsciencious machines as computers.
All things considered,computers have show tremendous merits in designing curriculums and attracting students'attention.Neverthless,teachers must be considered as pivotal roles as guides.