611 views
0 votes
0 votes

Abortion should be seemed as unlawful action. To which extent do you agree with

The issue related to abortion has been discussed these days. Some people assert that abortion ought to be seemed as an illegal and uncivilized action, whilst others argue against that idea. Personally, I find the latter viewpoint more convincing for following reasons.

To begin with, the privacy and freedom (pro-choice) of women ought to be protected. To clarify, most pregnant mothers love as well as want the best for their unborn child. Unfortunately, not everyone has the sufficient conditions, such as financial, health and culture conditions to bring their little child up well. Therefore, in some cases, terminating the unborn children is considered as the best choice for them and their children. Take women in the poor neighborhoods, for the examples, who have to struggle with lives to earn a single penny to take care of their sick mothers, and suffer malnutrition. As a result, they are aware that if they give birth the child, he or she would suffer a harsh live without happiness.

Secondly, the earth is now dealing with insufficient space for human beings to live in. In other words, if governments allow abortion as the legal practice, the global population might increase more slowly. Consequently, global citizens’ living standards are improved. Take USA, Norway, Japan and UK for the prime examples for high rate of abortion, where their living standards are much higher as compared to other countries though their living spaces are still quite deficient

In short, I recommend that the authorities should allow abortion due to the right of women and the global population problem.

 

Examine the arguments in favour of and against animal experiments, and come to a conclusion on this issue. ( to which extent u agree with)

Issue related to animal experimentation is frequently discussed these days. Some people assert that the use animal in science is immoral action, whilst others argue that we ought to test medicines on animals prior to for human use. Nevertheless, I find both viewpoints convincing for following reasons

On the one hand, firstly, it is clear that animal testing save human lives. In other words, many life-saving drugs, vaccines and cures or treatments are invented from testing animals. Secondly, the animals which we have been testing on are wild and might do not play a very integral role in human community and the natural environment. Take mice for plausible examples, we have not proved the benefits of mice in our nature so far, while laboratory mice help us in inventing many vaccines.

On the other hand, the animal testing is seemed as an immorality for some people. To begin with, there are alternative methods to figure out the influence of drugs, even better than the animal experimentation. Whereby, there is no need to keep testing on those innocent animals. Take studying cell culture in a petri dish for an example. Secondly, the experimentation is cruel and inhumane. To clarify, according to Humane Society International, the animals are commonly subjected to forced feeding, inhalation and infliction of burns as other wounds to study the healing process as well as the chemical irritation.

In short, I think that the animal experimentation is positive way to strike back diseases, but we ought to alleviate the frequency of the use of this method. We also could apply other alternative methods.

 

 

by
27 points

Please log in or register to answer this question.

3 Answers

1 vote
1 vote

On the one hand, firstly, it is clear that animal testing save human lives. In other words, many life-saving drugs, vaccines and cures or treatments are invented from testing animals. Secondly, the animals which we have been testing on are wild and might do not play a very integral role in human community and the natural environment. Take mice for plausible examples, we have not proved the benefits of mice in our nature so far, while laboratory mice help us in inventing many vaccines.

by
3 points
0 votes
0 votes

Note : ý tưởng của bạn là khá táo bạo tuy nhiên cá nhân mình thấy chưa thuyết phục.mục đích chính và cách lý giải chưa thực sự logic.lý giải của bạn ok nhưng mình nghĩ bạn nên tìm 1 vài câu topic cho ý tưởng hay hơn.

winksmiley

1. 1 số cấu trúc mình nghĩ nên thay thế

-these days→ recently 

- most pregnant mothersmost of pregnant mothers

2. liên kết đoạn văn 

"To begin with, the privacy and freedom (pro-choice) of women ought to be protected. To clarify, most pregnant mothers love as well as want the best for their unborn child. Unfortunately, not everyone has the sufficient conditions, such as financial, health and culture conditions to bring their little child up well. Therefore, in some cases, terminating the unborn children is considered as the best choice for them and their children. Take women in the poor neighborhoods, for the examples, who have to struggle with lives to earn a single penny to take care of their sick mothers, and suffer malnutrition. As a result, they are aware that if they give birth the child, he or she would suffer a harsh live without happiness." 

đoạn này câu topic và diễn giải có vẻ không liên quan tới nhau.

"Secondly, the earth is now dealing with insufficient space for human beings to live in. "

câu này mình nghĩ bạn nên nói rõ là không đủ chỗ ở cho dân số trên toàn cầu.

by
9 points
0 votes
0 votes

On the one hand, firstly, it is clear that animal testing save human lives. In other words, many life-saving drugs, vaccines and cures or treatments are invented from testing animals. Secondly, the animals which we have been testing on are wild and might do not play a very integral role in human community and the natural environment. Take mice for plausible examples, we have not proved the benefits of mice in our nature so far, while laboratory mice help us in inventing many vaccines.

by
217 points

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer