Topic: Some people think that parnts should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Answer:
Living environment has made big influences on children’s awareness and behavior. Both arguments over whether home or school is responsible for teaching children good comportments to be useful for society have strong supports. This essay will look at the necessity of parents and school teachers in this issue before the most reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Firstly, it is easy to see the impact of family predecessors on the growth of children. The disappointing story about the boy Hao Anh in Cantho plays a good example here. Because of not educated carefully, he savagely and ruthlessly beat his foster parents who voluntarily adopted him when he was a piteous orphan. Thus, if a child is neglected by his family and relatives, he will become unmanner. The importance of home teaching to young citizens has been proven very indispensable.
On the other hand, it must be remembered that schools also take the blame for children instruction. For example, by learning civics lessons at school, my friends and I have full understanding about overpopulation in recent decades and run a campaign to propagandize birth-control policy for people living in our city. Skill qualifications and preaching of instructors is shown to convincingly impress students and let them mimic. Therefore, the obvious effect of teachers on making a student useful for society is undeniable.
In summary, both family and school have huge and considerable roles for deciding how children will behave and what kind of people they will become. For this reason, the two sides must co-operate and assist each other parallelly so that their students and children can be dutiful and do them proud.