Please have a check of this essay for me. Thanks.
It is controversial that a hike price of petrol is an optimal approach to the growing number of vehicles and alarming pollution. From my perspective, however, I am against the solution because of some following reasons.
As we all know, petrol is closely attached to a nation’s economy, therefore, a drastic increase in gasoline price brings about negative impacts on people’s lives and, in a larger aspect, on the development of that country. Instead, we should look for some alternatives to the issue. On the one hand, we can impose high tax on any household who possess more than a car. This both encourages carpools amongst families and tightens their bonds. On the other hand, in some countries, people are still not familiar with public transport due to a lack of its quantity and bus routes inaccessible to remote areas. Once these matters are solved, the number of traffic will be instantly reduced.
It is obviously true that traffic emits lots of damaging smoke to the air. However, pollution originates from people’s various activities such as the burning of fuels like gas, coal or oil, radiation spills, nuclear accidents and so on. Should we impose high cost on petrol which does harm to the environment, we ought to carry out the same actions for other factors. In my opinion, an escalating price for things out of the control does not change the situation but merely indicates the administrative weakness. In place of surging charge, an improvement of people’s awareness to consume less plays a crucial role in pollution reduction. In addition, measures should be taken to control birth rates as it is the primary cause of overconsumption. Furthermore, a recycling implementation which is beneficial to reducing production emissions has a major contribution to a better environment. With these mentioned alternatives, a rising cost of petrol becomes impossibly applicable.
In sum, there are numerous options to tackle air pollution but increasing cost of petrol seems an infeasible approach since it would stagnate a national economy and hence bring down people’s life quality.