TASK 2 - ENVIRONMENT (Mình rất mong nhận được góp ý từ mọi người ạ!)
264 views
0 votes
0 votes

Task 2: People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.

Answer

It is believed that the price of fuel can be used as a means to regulate the number of transports in traffic. Therefore, there is a view that it is advisable for the government to raise the fuel’s cost to improve the environment’s condition. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this opinion.

First of all, I believe that growing the price of fuel may not address the environmental issues effectively. Firstly, people are not likely to stop using their current vehicles as these are indispensable for them to commute. Instead, they would accept the higher cost of fuel in spite of dissatisfaction. This is evident in the global rise in fuel’s price in 2022, most people still travel by private transports. Ultimately, the number of vehicles after the government’s decision would almost stay the same. In addition, if the fuel’s cost is suddenly increased, it might cause disapproval among citizens, leading to demonstrations against the authorities. This could even bring about more damage to the environment.

On the other hand, various other approaches can be taken to deal with environmental problems. One vital solution is to educate citizens about the importance of protecting their habitat as well as the consequences humans have to face if the natural surroundings are polluted. This could be implemented by teaching children at schools, attaching posters appealing for environmental protection on streets, and so on. Besides, allocating more funding to environmental organizations is a way to foster their activities to enhance the habitat’s condition. In addition, strict laws about businesses’ responsibilities for the environment should be enacted as their production processes often impact detrimentally on the habitat.

In conclusion, I completely disapprove of the idea of raising the cost of fuel for transports to enhance the polluted environment as it may not be appropriate. 

-------------------------------------------------
Mình rất mong được mọi người góp ý và chữa bài writing của mình ạ.
Cảm ơn mọi người rất nhiều!!!
by
0 points

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

1 vote
1 vote
I USED GRAMMARLY TO CHECK YOUR WRITING TASK 2
OVERALL, U DID A GREAT JOB. JUST SOME SENTENCES ARE NOT CLEAR ENOUGH, AND YOU SHOULD USE "AND" INSTEAD OF "AS LONG AS".
 
 
It is believed that the price of fuel can be used as a means to regulate the number of transports in traffic. Therefore, there is a view that the government should raise the fuel’s cost to improve the environment’s condition. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this opinion.
 
First, I believe that growing the price of fuel may not address the environmental issues effectively. Firstly, people are not likely to stop using their current vehicles as they are indispensable for commuting. Instead, they would accept the higher fuel cost despite dissatisfaction. This is evident in the global rise in fuel’s prices in 2022, and most people still travel by private transport. Ultimately, the number of vehicles after the government’s decision would almost stay the same. In addition, if the fuel’s cost is suddenly increased, it might cause disapproval among citizens, leading to demonstrations against the authorities. This could even bring about more damage to the environment.
 
On the other hand, various other approaches can be taken to deal with environmental problems. One vital solution is to educate citizens about the importance of protecting their habitat and the consequences humans have to face if the natural surroundings are polluted. This could be implemented by teaching children at schools, attaching posters appealing for environmental protection on the streets, etc. Besides, allocating more funding to environmental organizations is a way to foster their activities to enhance the habitat’s condition. In addition, strict laws about businesses’ responsibilities for the environment should be enacted as their production processes often impact detrimentally on the habitat.
 
In conclusion, I disapprove of the idea of raising the cost of fuel for transport to enhance the polluted environment as it may not be appropriate. 
 
 
THIS IS HOW YOUR WRITING TASK 2 IS PARAPHRASED
 
It is thought that the price of gasoline can be utilised to control the number of vehicles in traffic. As a result, some argue that the government should boost fuel prices in order to improve the environment's situation. This is an opinion with which I completely disagree.
 
First, I feel that raising the price of gasoline will not adequately address environmental concerns. To begin with, people are unlikely to abandon their current vehicles, which are necessary for commuting. Instead, despite their discontent, they would accept the higher fuel cost. This is reflected in the global increase in fuel prices in 2022, while the majority of people continue to travel by private vehicle. After the government's decision, the number of automobiles on the road will practically remain the same.Furthermore, if the cost of fuel is abruptly increased, citizens may become dissatisfied, leading to protests against the authorities. This could end up causing much more environmental damage.
 
On the other hand, there are a variety of additional ways that can be used to address environmental issues. One critical answer is to educate folks about the necessity of safeguarding their environment and the consequences that humanity will face if the environment is contaminated. This might be done by teaching youngsters in schools, putting up posters on the streets advocating for environmental protection, and so on. Furthermore, increasing financing for environmental organisations is a means to encourage their efforts to improve habitat conditions. Additionally, rigors legislation governing enterprises' environmental duties should be adopted, as their manufacturing operations frequently have a negative impact on the environment.
 
To summarise, I oppose the idea of raising the cost of transportation fuel to improve the dirty environment since it may not be acceptable.
by
102 points

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
3 answers