IELTS Task 2: There's a debate about whether urban sprawl is a good thing. What is your opinion?

Question

The spread of metropolitan construction is said to be whether a harmful development or a beneficial sign. From my point of view, urban sprawl does show several tell-tale disadvantages.

First and foremost, the urbanization trends involve reducing forest density in rural areas. When residents in megalopolises hold an annual population growth, the need for building land rises. Consequently, this natural phenomenon causes a grove of flourishing trees to disappear-also known as deforestation. A profuse outpouring of infrastructure such as regional transport networks, stations of all kinds invades a large scale of natural spaces. Furthermore, it might also lead to a lack of civil green space and the loss of biodiversity and wildlife habitats.

Second, the urban expansion increases pollution dramatically. Such groundwork processes usually leave pollutants, including bricks, metals, asphalt, concrete. Moreover, when wasted, they would affect the water and air quality. As a result, citizens could suffer from pneumonia, lungs diseases, and cancer. Additionally, our mentality might also be infected with  bad habits. The lifestyle of such youngsters could be greatly influenced by the modern downtown. Cellular devices, high-tech equipment and enhanced life services, although convenient, cause obesity and laziness to a plethora of civic dwellers. Inhabitants are “polluted” in either way, whether by the contaminated environment or the excessive handy entertainment.

In conclusion, urban sprawl has lots of adverse impacts. Not only does it cut down profuse and vigorous forests, but it also results in health issues. In my opinion, we should improve our living place first instead of extending it.