The dynamic technological development is diminishing the ecosystem gradually. Lack of natural interactions force governments to build more zoos or so called the prisons of innocent offenders. Deducing from that matter, I believe that we should reduce the exposure of animals detaining for plenteous reasons.
First of all, it is worth contemplating the unprecise living environment due to limited space, especially in cities. Altenativing living place from huge forests to small playground is a barrier for wild animals to get used to. And added with the spoiled atmosphere and noise pollution, our "jungle friends" would be seriously harmed. Instead of this, we had better amend evironmental determinism particularly legislation,fines, and otherwordly.
Secondly, if animals are ambushed in extended laspe, they will lose inherent defensive skills. In any natural alike way are they constructed, zoos have the inability to resemble harsh competitive world. Opposed to the real habitats where plentful inhabitants fight for higher positions, animals in zoos are likely to be commercialised. This threatens the value of natural history and conventional education perspective.
Although elevating animals in blocked cages was believed to be convenient for observation, students may assume that most of the powerless animals endured are harmless. This might lead to unexpected accidents and further viewers would be under apprehension about the injury risk.
On the other hand, there existed polarity showing that wild animals need to be conserved and zoos take part as a suitable place for them. In my opinion, animals can only be protected if deforestation no longer implements. Zoos would come as a torture of animal liberal opression.
Considering all stated viewpoints, keeping animals in captivity is unacceptable. Governments must take actions in modifying lawsuit till it is a right for animals to enrapture their freedom in nature.
