Currently, the idea that establishing museums with purpose is entertainment instead of education arouses enormous these issues vary greatly. As far as I am concerned, the arguments on both sides of such a view need to be examined carefully.
People who stand for the view above should have their own reasons, one of which could be that building in enjoyable places may attract many people. This is especially helpful for juveniles, who have tended to prefer entertainment activities, so museums often put more of an emphasis on enjoyment rather than learning. Another argument which should be taken into account is that tourists may visit easier. For example, in the United Kingdom, most of the museums were constructed at many center streets, where foreign tourists may find it easier to visit.
However, looking at these issues in long-term, such a view may not be true in several cases. To begin with, many opponents could argue that museums may promote positive attitudes to history. By coming to visit museums, people can enhance knowledge of culture and history. One further justification which proves to be quite reasonable is that it can educate chauvinism. By many relics of the past, people may have proud of their countries. Thus, it promotes the love of homeland in inside everyone. With regard to the last argument, it is acknowledged that the museums provide many actually witnesses for the next generations. Looking beyond, this may create many cultural and historical values for their countries.
For the above-mentioned points, it is obvious that despite there being circumstances in which such a view may be true, I am convinced that determining which side of the issue to stand for is by no means an easy task for everybody. It is important to understand that such an opinion should be viewed from different angles.