Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid

Question

Many peolpe argue that developed countries often helped the poorer countries by sponsoring money however it cannot remove poverty. Hence, the rich countries should think about another effective way to help the poor countries. Personally, I completely agree with that view.

For a variety of reasons, it would be true that finacial aid cannot solve poverty. One reason is that sponsoring money is not a permanent method. For instance, the poorer country receives finance from the richer one and then give to the poor. Maybe it can last even four to five years but cannot be forever. So that the poor lives condition will still exist. Furthermore, financial aid is limited as not all the poor or developing countries receive money from the developing one. Therefore, the investment of money is not sufficient for this problem.

On the other hand, there are variety reasons why governments should find another way to help the poorer governments besides financial aid. Firstly, the developing countries can organize some program such as student exchanging or study abroad with scholarship to open the chance of studying for students who live in poor countries. Secondly, the tax of imported products can be reduced by the rich governments. For example, if Vietnam exports fruit to American with a low tax, they can get a higher income from their sold products.

In conclusion,for the reasons i have mentioned above, i strongly believe that there are lots of other effective way that the developing countries can do to help the poorer countries to develop.

Answer 1

Many peolpe argue that developed countries often have helped the poorer countries by sponsoring money, however, it (this) cannot remove poverty. Hence, the rich countries should think about another effective way (nên để số nhiều other effective ways) to help the poor countries. Personally, I completely agree with that view.

For a variety of reasons, it would be true that finacial (financial) aid cannot solve poverty. One reason is that (one of the reasons is that) sponsoring money is not a permanent method. For instance, the poorer country (underdeveloped countries) receives finance from  the richer ones (developed ones), and then give to the poor (provide a cash subsidy to the poor, especially the homeless and the unemployed). Maybe it This subsidization can last even perhaps four to five years but cannot be forever (it isn't long-lasting), So that which in turn exists the poor lives living conditions will still exist. Furthermore, financial aid is limited as not only all the poor countries or but also developing countries (ones) receive money from the developing (developed) ones. Therefore, the investment of money is not sufficient for this problem.

On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why governments should find another way to help the poorer governments besides financial aid. Firstly, the developing (developed) countries can organize some programs such as student exchanging exchange programs or studying abroad with scholarships to open the chance of studying for students who live in poor countries (poor countries=underprivileged countries). Secondly, the tax of imported products can should be reduced by the rich governments. For example, if Vietnam exports fruit to American with a low tax, they can get a higher income from their sold products.

In conclusion,for the reasons i have mentioned above, i strongly believe that there are lots of other effective ways that the developing (developed) countries can do to help the poorer countries to develop.

Poor countries=underdeveloped countries=underprivileged countries=poverty-stricken countries

Developing countries=countries in a backward sate: cácnước đang phát triển

Developed countries=rich countries: các nước phát triển