Some people think newly built houses as same as the old house style in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to built houses in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Some individuals believe that architecture of newly built houses should be designed as that of old house style in local areas. While others claim that people should be entiled to have their houses constructed freestyle. Although both schools of opinion hold a value of accuracy, I agree with the second one that building houses in new and unique styles should not have any boundary.
On the one hand, new buildings’ design should base on the available one of old structures as advantages of these style have been proven over time. Specifically, old-building style’ requirements that are often simple are suitable with almost types of topogrophy. For instance, tub house was desinged in 15th century, however, this style of building has been applied into new buildings around the world as its charecteristics are compatible with narrow acreage. Consequently, constructing new house following old ones can solve problems that cannot be dealed thoroughly by new designs.
On the other hand, local authorities should encourage their citizens to get their houses built in freestyle as these new style can brings much tourism value. In detail, allowing house to be built without any limits in style leads to the fact that there will be many uique buildings from shape to material such as Dynamic Tower in Dubai . As a result, these buildings would become citiy’s hightlight attracting a large number of tourisms that contributes to city’s development.
To conclude, despite many controversial opinion about which style of houses should be allowed to built, traditional or modern one, I support the claim that new style design should be encouraged by local authorities as they help boost city’s development rapidly, especially countrisides.