ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới

Lưu ý: Check bài viết với Grammarly trước để tránh lỗi đơn giản! Click banner dưới đây để check


Chúng mình đang tuyển CTV chữa bài CÓ TRẢ PHÍ - các bạn có thể apply ở đây: "https://forms.gle/cpVjgt2TggRyVckHA"
Website Chuawritingmienphi là forum chữa bài miễn phí, được chữa từ chính cộng đồng học IELTS.
Các bạn xem bài chữa mẫu tại "http://bit.ly/baichuaW-demo"
Đối với các bài chữa thiếu nghiêm túc sẽ được kiểm duyệt và BAN tài khoản của học viên đó.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

3.7k Bài viết

4.9k Góp ý

2.5k bình luận

110k thành viên

Whether people should compulsorily pursue full-time training from school throughout their first 18 years in life is regularly brought into discussion. I opine that both viewpoints have pros and cons; in other word, I partly agree with the opinion provided.

On the one hand, not only the students but also people around take several advantages form giving priority to education until 18. Firstly, students would develop comprehensively during the time of training at schools. Particularly, the curriculums in each level provided are prepared carefully to meet the demands of each growing stage in mental and physical health of students. Moreover, thanks to the compulsory education, there would be no extinctions among the students and their conditions. Secondly, parents find it convenient and trustworthy when they send their children to school everyday. While the adults have their own business to earn the living and are lack of time for caring children, training places are ideal to take responsibilities for them. Along with monitoring, the educators help the students build good manners and widen their knowledge.

On the other hands, there are still some drawbacks existing if people have to take compulsory education whole-time until they are 18 years old. Firstly, this kind of training would form a strict control over the receivers. For instant, 16-year-old people are recognized as matures under some legal systems; therefore, those have the rights to decide their life, especially whether continuing studying or not. In other word, this oppose to the mandatory full-time education that they have been offered. Secondly, a group of people who take whole-time education for granted would not appreciate their study opportunities. In addition, they would have negative attitudes toward their curriculum and, more seriously, behave against the teachers and classmates. Not to mention the result that those people would disturb other students who want to concentrate on their studying.

In conclusion, that full-time education is required until people get 18 is controversial due to its duality. However, most countries around the world have maintained their compulsory education system until high school despite existing disadvantages.
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi cách đây trong Opinion bởi (0 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.


Update: Từ 30/4 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm Điểm nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...