ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới

Lưu ý: Check bài viết với Grammarly trước để tránh lỗi đơn giản! Click banner dưới đây để check


Chúng mình đang tuyển CTV chữa bài CÓ TRẢ PHÍ - các bạn có thể apply ở đây: "https://forms.gle/cpVjgt2TggRyVckHA"
Website Chuawritingmienphi là forum chữa bài miễn phí, được chữa từ chính cộng đồng học IELTS.
Các bạn xem bài chữa mẫu tại "http://bit.ly/baichuaW-demo"
Đối với các bài chữa thiếu nghiêm túc sẽ được kiểm duyệt và BAN tài khoản của học viên đó.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

3.8k Bài viết

5k Góp ý

2.5k bình luận

110k thành viên

People have diverse options about the state’s expenditure on art. Some people argued that instead of squandering money on art organizations, governments should allocate taxpayers’ money for the improvement of other basic necessities. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I believe that state funding of art is worth every penny.

 

There are some justifications given by people who oppose diverting funds towards arts. First of all, art is not considered to be essential, compared to other critical aspects of the sustainability of human’s life. For example, state budgets should be spent on public services such as education, healthcare and infrastructure, which are vital for a country to function properly. In addition to this, it is argued that some art projects are self-sufficient in finance, for they can earn money from ticket sales and private investors. As a result, it is superfluous for government to allocate budget for the arts.

 

Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, I would content that art should be given the top priority. On the individual level, art has been regarded as the valuable supplement for humans’ soul. For instance, art products enhance our spiritual lives by reducing psychological stress and bringing us great faith in promising future. On the social level, investment in arts is such a strategic way to boost the economy. Traditional arts, take local handicraft as an example, make a profound impression on international tourists, which facilitates the development of tourism industry. Therefore, it is indisputable that arts generate revenue in return.

 

In conclusion, it is clear to me that art expenditure is advantageous for both individuals and society, so funding arts by the government is not a wastage of money.

Enable Ginger

Cannot connect to Ginger Check your internet connection
or reload the browserDisable in this text fieldRephraseRephrase current sentenceLog in to edit with Ginger×
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi trong Opinion bởi (0 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.

1 góp ý

0 phiếu

People have diverse options --> opinions about the state’s expenditure on art --> which is necessary. Some people argued that instead of squandering money on art organizations, governments should allocate taxpayers’ money for the improvement of other basic necessities à--> more essential and urgent things. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I believe that state funding of art is worth every penny.

There are some justifications given by people who oppose diverting funds towards arts. First of all,(chỉ dùng trong speaking) -->  Firstly, art is not considered to be essential, compared to other critical aspects of the sustainability of human’s life. For example, state budgets should be spent on public services such as education, healthcare and infrastructure, which are vital for a country to function properly. In addition to this, it is argued that some art projects are self-sufficient in finance, for they can earn money from ticket sales and private investors. As a result, it is superfluous for government to allocate budget for the arts.

Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, I still believe that benefits of art outweigh the amount of money invested on it, so I would content that art should be given the top priority. On the individual level, art has been regarded as the valuable supplement for humans’ soul. For instance, art products enhance our spiritual lives by reducing psychological stress and bringing us great faith in promising future. On the social level, investment in arts is such a strategic way to boost the economy. Traditional arts, take local handicraft as an example, make a profound impression on international tourists, which facilitates the development of tourism industry. Therefore, it is indisputable that arts generate revenue in return.

In conclusion, it is clear to me that art expenditure is advantageous for both individuals and society, so funding arts by the government is not a wastage of money.

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý bởi (303 điểm)

Update: Từ 30/4 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm Điểm nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...