ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới

Lưu ý: Check bài viết với Grammarly trước để tránh lỗi đơn giản! Click banner dưới đây để check


Chúng mình đang tuyển CTV chữa bài CÓ TRẢ PHÍ - các bạn có thể apply ở đây: "https://forms.gle/cpVjgt2TggRyVckHA"
Website Chuawritingmienphi là forum chữa bài miễn phí, được chữa từ chính cộng đồng học IELTS.
Các bạn xem bài chữa mẫu tại "http://bit.ly/baichuaW-demo"
Đối với các bài chữa thiếu nghiêm túc sẽ được kiểm duyệt và BAN tài khoản của học viên đó.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

3.6k Bài viết

4.8k Góp ý

2.5k bình luận

109k thành viên

It is undenied that technology gives us a brand-new way to observe historical artifacts and paintings, directly through our screens. While I partly agree with this viewpoint, I also suggest that the values of storage institutions such as museums or art galleries is dispensable

In the Internet era, everyone can easily have a detailed copy of any works just a-click. It is such an convenient way for them when they can save an amount time of queing and waiting in an exhibitions event. Also, museums and art galleries can make the most of these trends when they can scan their artifacts through specialised scanner and collect money from viewers. For example, Natural Museums located in NY started to rolling out their virtual viewing serviced called LA; by augmented virtual ( AR ) , audiences would feel the same felling as roaming around any exhibitions.

However, these experience have some negative issues. Firstly is the membership costs, average cost of virtual services like LA usually fluctuates between 50 $ and 100 $, that is too high for an normal income. Seconds is the conception, without a profession, people can have some negative bias for a work, which usually comes from their misinformation about its characteristics situation when introduced to the world. These could lead to awful consequences, for example, the masterpieces of Florence artist were boycotted by having a naked girl on canvas when people saw its copy on Facebook; actually, its hidden meaning is that women at that time was treated very badly and often becomes the victim of sexual violence.

In conclusion, I agree that everyone can see historical objects or art works very easily, but sometimes the true values of some masterpieces would be misunderstood.

 

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi trong Discussion bởi (0 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.

1 góp ý

0 phiếu

It is undenied that technology gives us a brand-new way to observe historical artifacts and paintings, directly through our screens. While I partly agree with this viewpoint, I also suggest that the values of storage institutions such as museums or art galleries is indispensable.

In the Internet era, everyone can easily have a detailed copy of any works just a-click. It is such an convenient way for them when they can save an amount time  (by saving a large amount of time spent on queing and waiting in an exhibitions event. Also, museums and art galleries can make the most of these trends when they can scan their artifacts through specialised scanner and collect money from viewers. For example, Natural Museums located in NY started to rolling out their virtual viewing serviced called LA; by augmented virtual ( AR ) , audiences would feel the same felling as roaming around any exhibitions.

However, these experience have some negative issues. Firstly is the membership costs, average cost of virtual services like LA usually fluctuates between 50 $ and 100 $, that is too high for an normal income. Seconds is the conception, without a profession, people can have some negative bias for a work, which usually comes from their misinformation about its characteristics situation when introduced to the world. These could lead to awful ( detrimental)consequences, for example, the masterpieces of Florence artist were boycotted by having a naked girl on canvas when people saw its copy on Facebook; actually, its hidden meaning is that women at that time was mistreated and often became the victim of sexual violence.

In conclusion, I agree that everyone can see historical objects or art works very easily, but sometimes the true values of some masterpieces would be misunderstood. (lạc đề), I agree that with the advancement of technology, people can easily access to art works; however, to alleviate the false meaning of asthetics, museums and galleries should be continute developing.

 

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý cách đây bởi (28 điểm)

Update: Từ 30/4 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm Điểm nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...