ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới

Lưu ý: Check bài viết với Grammarly trước để tránh lỗi đơn giản! Click banner dưới đây để check


Chúng mình đang tuyển CTV chữa bài CÓ TRẢ PHÍ - các bạn có thể apply ở đây: "https://forms.gle/cpVjgt2TggRyVckHA"
Website Chuawritingmienphi là forum chữa bài miễn phí, được chữa từ chính cộng đồng học IELTS.
Các bạn xem bài chữa mẫu tại "http://bit.ly/baichuaW-demo"
Đối với các bài chữa thiếu nghiêm túc sẽ được kiểm duyệt và BAN tài khoản của học viên đó.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

3.5k Bài viết

4.8k Góp ý

2.5k bình luận

109k thành viên

Nuclear energy is thought to be the best solution to the increasing energy demand. In my opinion, I agree that nuclear energy is better than other sources despite its meltdown risk and limited sources.


There are several reasons why people believe that other energy sources such as renewable energy and fossil fuels are better than nuclear energy. The main point for this argument is that nuclear energy, if not done right, might lead to unpredictable accidents. Take the Chernobyl steam explosion as a concrete example, improper management of the plant operators has caused severe nuclear contamination exposing the whole area, leading to radiation poisoning of entire ecosystems nearby. Furthermore, fission fuels such as Uranium and Thorium are limited energy resources which are predicted to be depleted in the foreseeable future while renewable energy derived from resources that are replenished naturally. The reliance on such sources may lead to an energy crisis in the future.

 

On the other hand, I firmly believe that nuclear energy is still our best option when it comes to tackling climate change and energy demands. Firstly, fossil fuels discharge carbon dioxide, which is the main greenhouse gases contributing to global warming and climate change throughout the world. Unlike conventional energy, nuclear energy is zero-emission as it splits atoms instead of burning hydrocarbon. Moreover, nuclear fuel is extremely dense and despite producing a massive amount of carbon-free energy, the land footprint of nuclear energy is considerably lower compared to that of other energy sources. Such efficient land use, therefore, would prevent possible deforestation and pave the way for economical venues. 


In conclusion, I suppose that nuclear energy is superior to other power sources in response to global energy needs and climate change.


(285 từ)

 
P/s: Bạn nào đó chấm bài này giúp mình nhé. Chúc một ngày tốt lành ^ ^
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi trong Opinion bởi (0 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.

1 góp ý

0 phiếu

Nuclear energy is thought to be the best solution to the increasing energy demand. In my opinion, I agree that nuclear POWER is better than other ENERGY sources despite its meltdown risk and limited RESOURCES.


There are several reasons why people believe that other energy sources such as renewable energy and fossil fuels are better than nuclear energy. The main point OF this argument is that nuclear energy, if not done right, might lead to unpredictable accidents. Take the Chernobyl steam explosion as a concrete example, improper management of the plant operators has caused severe nuclear contamination exposing the whole area, leading to radiation poisoning of entire ecosystems nearby. Furthermore, fission fuels such as Uranium and Thorium are limited energy resources which are predicted to be depleted in the foreseeable future while renewable energy DERIVE from resources that are replenished naturally. The reliance on such RESOURCES may lead to an energy crisis in the future.

 

On the other hand, I firmly believe that nuclear energy is still our best option when it comes to TACKLE climate change and energy demands. Firstly, fossil fuels discharge carbon dioxide, which is the main greenhouse GAS contributing to global warming and climate change throughout the world. Unlike conventional energy, nuclear energy is zero-emission as it splits atoms instead of burning hydrocarbon. Moreover, nuclear fuel is extremely dense and despite producing a massive amount of carbon-free energy, the land footprint of nuclear energy is considerably lower compared to that of other energy sources. Such efficient land use, therefore, would prevent possible deforestation and pave the way for economical venues. 

 

In conclusion, I suppose that nuclear energy is superior to other power sources in response to global energy needs and climate change.

 

*Phần in hoa là phần mình sửa nha

 
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý bởi (93 điểm)

Update: Từ 30/4 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm Điểm nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...