Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Over the past few years, we have seen a controversial recognition of that visitors around the world should be charged more than local residents for attractive sites of culture and history. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this issue.
First of all, it is my personal belief that foreigners must be less responsible for contributing to such impressive destinations than the locals. Obviously, international visitors do spend their money on food, souvenirs, travelling or services, which benefits the economy of the host country. This is a noticeable reason why local people ought to consider the amount of money visitors support just as an additional donation which not only shows travellers’ overwhelming assistance and enthusiam but also plays an desired role in maintaining these cultural and historical sites. Whilst, local visitors need to perform their responsibility for keeping such important sites going, which means they should refuse to donate several lower payments than foreigners.
To my way of thinking, this situation would be able to result in some potential outcomes. In fact, if travellers over the world realise that they offered such destinations a higher fortune than the inhabitants, they would feel disrespectful and share negative comments for their relatives or friends. It means that it is the local people that prevents international travellers from choosing to their country as a favorable place for entertainment. As a result, their country would suffer from an increasingly considerable decrease in its economy.
In conclusion, it is strongly believe that it is unnecessary to have local people involve in giving a smaller amount of money than travellers from all over the wolrd. Also, great effort from various range of people should be made to encourage them to visit the host country.