ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới

Update: Từ 30/4/2019 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

2.5k Bài viết

3.6k Góp ý

2.1k bình luận

60.1k thành viên

Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Art and culture have long been considered as the important role in people social life from previous until nowadays. Today, some people hold the view is that the government funding should not be payed for supporting art and culture while some those believe is that promote the culture term may be have benefits for the citizens also culture point. This essay will discuss these views in depth and give my opinion.

The first view is just right in some extents. First of all, in the developing country, it may have many fields which should need to be promoted to develop nation such as economy, industry or society. Therefore, the necessary sector is that the government should spend more funding for investing in what industries fields their country needs and enhance standard life of their citizens than other activities. For example, in Africa, if the government spend too much money of their funding for promoting their culture and art, they will do not have sufficient budget for balancing their citizens life. It is terrible that local dwellers will live under the poverty line just due to the wrong decision of government in investing. Moreover, art and culture reflect the creation of people throughout many centuries, so they have their own value. People can suppose is that art and culture will develop themselves in natural life day by day because human always have continuous innovation in their life which help the life become perfectly. Thus, the government may do not need to use an excess of funding for supporting art and culture.

When the second view put into the consideration, it is convincing in some sides. As regard, in some developed countries, young people seem to tend to lack care art and their culture. It can be seen is that in modern society, people, especially young generation just over concentrate on the internet and rarely go outside to take part in traditional activities or come to art galleries to enjoy a work of art. This is important prioritize for government to use their budget to promote their culture also their interesting art campaign. It is a possible way to attract young people to learn more about nation traditional and priceless art which their country has. In addition, if art and culture will be developed by government, it will be become one of the attraction points for oversea travelers to come and study about. Obviously, when many people desire to discover cultural features of this nation, the tourism of this country may develop and gain their reputation with various places in the world.

In conclusion, some people suggest that the government budget should not be spend on supporting art and culture, but others think supporting cultural activities may usefully for the population and the culture, these views may have both side advantages and disadvantages. However, in my opinion the first view is more overweight than other because it brings the property and welfare for citizens life and it is the effective way for government to have developmental country.

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi trong Opinion bởi (13 điểm)
sửa nội dung bởi
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.

1 góp ý

+1 phiếu

Art and culture have long been considered as the important role in people social life from previous until nowadays. Today, some people hold the view is that the government funding should not be payedpaid for supporting art and culture while some those believe is that promote the culture term may be have benefits for the citizens also culture point. This essay will discuss these views in depth and give my opinion.



The first view is just right in some extents. First of all, in the developing country, it may have many fields which should need to be promoted to develop a nation such as economy, industry or society. Therefore, the necessary sector is that the government should spend more funding for investing in what industriesindustry's fields their country needs and enhance the living standard life of their citizens than other activities. For example, in Africa, if the government spend too much money ofon their funding for promoting their culture and art, they will do not have a sufficient budget for balancing their citizenscitizens' life. It is terrible that local dwellers will live under the poverty line just due to the wrong decision of the government in investing. Moreover, art and culture reflect the creation of people throughout many centuries, so they have their own value. People can suppose is that art and culture will develop themselves in natural life day by day because humanhumans always have continuous innovation in their lifelives, which help the life become perfectly. Thus, the government may do not need to use an excess of funding for supporting art and culture.



When the second view put into the consideration, it is convincing inon some sides. As regard, in some developed countries, young people seem to tend to lack care art and their culture. It can be seen is that in modern society, people, especially youngyounger generation just over concentrate on the internetInternet and rarely go outside to take part in traditional activities or come to art galleries to enjoy a work of art. This is important to prioritize for the government to use their budget to promote their culture alsoand their interesting art campaign. It is a possible way to attract young people to learn more about nation traditional and priceless art which their country has. In addition, if art and culture will be developed by the government, it will be become one of the attraction points for oversea travelersoverseas travellers to come and study about. Obviously, when many people desire to discover cultural features of this nation, the tourism of this country may develop and gain their reputation with various places in the world.



In conclusion, some people suggest that the government budget should not be spendspent on supporting art and culture, but others think supporting cultural activities may usefully for the population and the culture,; these views may have both side advantages and disadvantages. However, in my opinion, the first view is more overweight than otherothers because it brings the property and welfare for citizenscitizen's life, and it is the an effective way for the government to have a developmental country.

 

 

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý bởi (228 điểm)

Update: Từ 30/4 Điểm bạn tích lũy được trên CWMP sẽ dùng để đổi quà (vé xem CGV (100 điểm/1 vé, thẻ cào điện thoại 150 điểm/thẻ 50k, khóa học IELTS Online (300 điểm/khóa 3 tháng)
Đăng ký quy đổi điểm tại: Form đổi điểm lấy quà"

Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm Điểm nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...