It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
7,405 views
0 votes
0 votes
It is argued that children should study local history because it is more important. This essay disagrees that school children should learn the history of their own country rather than the history of the world. Firstly, this essay will discuss the reason why children have to learn about local history. Secondly, discuss how the history of other countries affects the history of other countries. 
The benefits of learning about the history of their homeland is extremely significant. Knowing about the past of their region or country will foster a sense of belonging and national pride in each child. Besides, it makes children aware of the events which happened in the past. For instance, by studying how their ancestors fought and made sacrifices for the freedom of the country. Vietnamese youngsters will appreciate the value of life and liberty that they enjoy today. Especially, when young children learn about their motherland through history lessons. As a result, they will gain a deeper understanding of each traditional events, and be motivated to maintain the customs for later generations.
On the other hand, the value of studying world history must not be underestimated. It is more crucial for school children to have some knowledge of people from other countries and different cultures because of the modern globalization. For example, if they know about the origins and past development of other people across the world, it will be easier for them to form a mutual understanding. Another reason is that a study of world history will provide the young generations with an overview of the confliction of nations, such as the colonialism and contemporary society.
In conclusion, I would argue that it is equally important for children to study local history as well as world history.
 
by
5 points

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes
It is argued that children should study local history because it is more important. This essay disagrees that school children should learn the history of their own country rather than the history of the world. Firstly, this essay will discuss the reason why children have to learn about local history. Secondly, discuss how the history of other countries affects the history of other countries. 
=> Theo mình, mở bài nên tóm gọn ý lại và paraphrase đề bài chi tiết hơn. Không nên đưa nội dung bài vào mở bài (Firstly..., Secondly) 
Mình ví dụ cách viết của mình: In my perspective, the idea of concentrating on local history rather than global history is completely naive. In this essay, I will put forth my arguments to support my view. 
 
The benefits of learning about the history of their homeland is are extremely significant. Knowing about the past of their region or country will foster a sense of belonging and national pride in each child. Besides, it makes children aware of the events which happened in the past. For instance, by studying how their ancestors fought and made sacrifices for the freedom of the country. Vietnamese youngsters will appreciate the value of life and liberty that they enjoy today. Especially, when young children learn about their motherland through history lessons (what do they learn from these history lessons? - unclear point). As a result, they will gain a deeper understanding of each traditional events, and be motivated to maintain the customs for later generations.
On the other hand, the value of studying world history must not be underestimated. It is more crucial for school children to have some knowledge of people from other countries and different cultures because of the modern globalization. For example, if they know about the origins and past development of other people across the world, it will be easier for them to form a mutual understanding. Another reason is that a study of world history will provide the young generations with an overview of the confliction of nations, such as the colonialism and contemporary society.
 
In conclusion, I would argue that it is equally important for children to study local history as well as world history.
 
by
11 points

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer