Topic: Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, with the help of our society, the life of creative artists can be better. Most people think that the authorities should support them. I believe that non-government organizations can give financially to encourage artists.
On the one hand, the government's encouragement is vital to artists and their projects. Perhaps by the governments want to change the quality of life’s artists who live in poverty. In fact, some artists who are successful, they are independent of financial, whereas others are struggling for life and low-income. Likewise, building non-profitable galleries to attract foreigners requires a huge amount of money from the non-government institution. Therefore, without financial funding from governments, our cities would be much less interesting.
On the other hand, creative artists do not need to use the government financial because creative artists like painters and musicians can receive financial support from the non-government institutions or their fan clubs. Besides, painters or musicians who can earn money when selling their products. For example, musicians as an example, sell their CD’s or soundtrack and join events to work continuously.
In conclusion, although some people argue that creative artists should not be funded by the government’s finances. It seems to me that the alternative sources should give financial support to artists.