ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới
Thành viên với 10 points trở lên sẽ được sửa bài bởi Team Writing 7.5 từ IELTS Planet - Học IELTS Online.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé.

2,088 Bài viết

2,954 Góp ý

1,942 bình luận

13,175 thành viên

As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is longer mere science fiction.

In the early of the 21st century, civilization witnessed significant scientific breakthroughs, especially the successful recreation of creatures. This raises the question regarding the likelihood and legitimacy of this application of humans. From my own perspective, the scheme may provoke public outcries despite inevitable benefits
On the one hand, there is a large body of arguments for the adaptation of this practice. Of utmost importance is the treatment of several serious diseases, reducing the number of fatalities. To be more specific, given the storage of healthy organs for individuals, their damaged or lost ones would be replaced and needed tissues could be generated for the patients. For instance, scientists have demonstrated the possibility of cloning healthy heart cells, which can be injected into areas of injured hearts. Another contributor is the long-term solution to infertility. Since current infertility treatments are marginally successful and involve multitudinous physically and emotionally painful procedures for a small chance of success, human cloning could make it possible for infertile couples to have children.
On the other hand, opponents maintain that the drawbacks brought about are more prominent in comparison with the aforementioned benefits. The most persuasive argument is that the risks are far too great at present. It is feared that human cloning would be cruel, because the process may result in a large number of miscarriages and deformities before a human could be successfully cloned. For instance, it took 272 attempts to create Dolly, the first cloned sheep. Even then, the child could not be guaranteed ongoing good health. Furthermore, with respect to ethical implications, strong objections are that reproductive cloning could be prone to abuse leading to the generation of humans whose organs and tissues would be harvested, while there are also concerns about how cloned individuals could integrate with families and with society at large.
In conclusion, taking both sides into prudent consideration, although human cloning does entail some medical advantages, the method is too unscrupulous and thereby should be prohibited for the sake of natural cycles.
 
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi 15 Tháng 11, 2017 trong Opinion bởi pmk123bp (15 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

4 góp ý

+2 phiếu
 
góp ý hay nhất
In the early of the 21st century, civilization witnessed significant scientific breakthroughs, especially the successful recreation of creatures. This raises the question regarding the likelihood and legitimacy of this application of humans. From my own perspective, the scheme may provoke public outcries despite inevitable benefits
On the one hand, there is a large body of arguments for the adaptation of this practice. Of utmost importance is the treatment of several serious diseases, reducing the number of fatalities. To be more specific, given the storage of healthy organs for individuals, their damaged or lost ones would be replaced and needed tissues could be generated for the patients. For instance, scientists have demonstrated the possibility of cloning healthy heart cells, which can be injected into areas of injured hearts. Another contributor is the long-term solution to infertility. Since current infertility treatments are marginally successful and involve multitudinous physically and emotionally painful procedures for a small chance of success, human cloning could make it possible for infertile couples to have children.
On the other hand, opponents maintain that the drawbacks brought about are more prominent in comparison with the aforementioned benefits. The most persuasive argument is that the risks are far too great at present. It is feared that human cloning would be cruel, because the process may result in a large number of miscarriages and deformities before a human could be successfully cloned. For instance, it took 272 attempts to create Dolly, the first cloned sheep. Even then, the child could not be guaranteed ongoing good health. Furthermore, with respect to ethical implications, strong objections are that reproductive cloning could be prone to abuse leading to the generation of humans whose organs and tissues would be harvested, while there are also concerns about how cloned individuals could integrate with families and with society at large.
In conclusion, taking both sides into prudent consideration, although human cloning does entail some medical advantages, the method is too unscrupulous and thereby should be prohibited for the sakes.
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý 7 Tháng 1 bởi auduong (20 điểm)
được bầu chọn là bài viết hay nhất 2 ngày cách đây bởi pmk123bp
+2 phiếu
In the early of the 21st century, civilization witnessed significant scientific breakthroughs, especially the successful recreation of creatures. This raises the question regarding the likelihood and legitimacy of this application of(by) humans. From my own perspective, the scheme may provoke public outcries despite inevitable benefits
On the one hand, there is a large body of arguments for the adaptation of this practice. Of utmost importance is the treatment of several serious diseases, reducing the number of fatalities. To be more specific, given the storage of healthy organs for individuals, their damaged or lost ones would be replaced and needed tissues could be generated for the patients. For instance, scientists have demonstrated the possibility of cloning healthy heart cells, which can be injected into areas of injured hearts. Another contributor is the long-term solution to infertility. Since current infertility treatments are marginally successful and involved in multitudinous physically and emotionally painful procedures for a small chance of success, human cloning could make it possible for infertile couples to have children.
On the other hand, opponents maintain that the drawbacks brought about are more prominent in comparison with the aforementioned benefits. The most persuasive argument is that the risks are far too great at present. It is feared that human cloning would be cruel, because the process may result in a large number of miscarriages and deformities before a human could be successfully cloned. For instance, it took 272 attempts to create Dolly, the first cloned sheep. Even then, the child could not be guaranteed ongoing good health. Furthermore, with respect to ethical implications, strong objections are that reproductive cloning could be prone to abuse leading to the generation of humans whose organs and tissues would be harvested, while there are also concerns about how cloned individuals could integrate with families and with society at large.
In conclusion, taking both sides into prudent consideration, although human cloning does entail some medical advantages, the method is too unscrupulous and thereby should be prohibited for the sake of natural cycles.
 
 

 

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý 15 Tháng 11, 2017 bởi nguyenminhkhai (25 điểm)
+2 phiếu
In the early of the 21st century, civilization witnessed significant scientific breakthroughs, especially the successful recreation of creatures. This raises the question regarding the likelihood and legitimacy of this application of humans. From my own perspective, the scheme may provoke public outcries despite inevitable benefits
On the one hand, there is a large body of arguments for the adaptation of this practice. Of utmost importance is the treatment of several serious diseases, reducing the number of fatalities. To be more specific, given the storage of healthy organs for individuals, their damaged or lost ones would be replaced and needed tissues could be generated for the patients. For instance, scientists have demonstrated the possibility of cloning healthy heart cells, which can be injected into areas of injured hearts. Another contributor is the long-term solution to infertility. Since current infertility treatments are marginally successful and involve multitudinous physically and emotionally painful procedures for a small chance of success, human cloning could make it possible for infertile couples to have children.
On the other hand, opponents maintain that the drawbacks brought about are more prominent in comparison with the aforementioned benefits. The most persuasive argument is that the risks are far too great at present. It is feared that human cloning would be cruel, because the process may result in a large number of miscarriages and deformities before a human could be successfully cloned. For instance, it took 272 attempts to create Dolly, the first cloned sheep. Even then, the child could not be guaranteed ongoing good health. Furthermore, with respect to ethical implications, strong objections are that reproductive cloning could be prone to abuse leading to the generation of humans whose organs and tissues would be harvested, while there are also concerns about how cloned individuals could integrate with families and with society at large.
In conclusion, taking both sides into prudent consideration, although human cloning does entail some medical advantages, the method is too unscrupulous and thereby should be prohibited for the sake of natural cycles.
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý 15 Tháng 11, 2017 bởi Đinh Thị Huyền My (23 điểm)
+1 phiếu
Chào bạn,

Rất cảm ơn bạn vì những góp ý của bạn trên website trong thời gian vừa qua. Chúng mình xin gửi đến bạn bài chữa cho bài viết này, hi vọng sẽ giúp bạn nhận ra được những điểm tốt và những điểm chưa tốt trong bài viết của mình. Hi vọng bạn sẽ tiếp tục giúp đỡ các bạn khác trong thời gian tới.

Bạn tải bài chữa về máy tại đây nhé: http://chuawritingmienphi.com/index.php/6932/people-cloning-beings-provide-becoming-reality-horrifies-longer-science-fiction

Chúc bạn học tốt
Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý 8 Tháng 12, 2017 bởi Christine Ho (129 điểm)

Tips: Thành viên với 10 points trở lên sẽ được sửa bài bởi Team Writing 7.5 :)
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

...