ip.chuawriting
Post bài mới
Thành viên với 10 points trở lên sẽ được sửa bài bởi Team Writing 7.5 từ IELTS Planet - Học IELTS Online.
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé.

2.1k Bài viết

3k Góp ý

2k bình luận

13.7k thành viên

Cheap airline encourages people to travel, however it affects the environment problems so the cost should be increased to discourage people to travel. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 

It is true that cheap air travel brings populace numerous benefits. While a number of people believe that the air travel should be more expensive in order to restricted people from traveling by air as it will cause environmental problems, I would argue that this doing is unrealistic.

 

On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why low-budget flights could be greatly stimulated. First of all, cheap air flight enables long-distance travel affordable for ordinary people. Therefore, there are more tourists take air planes to other countries, the more people have opportunities to understand deeply from different cultures. In other words, it would promote cultural exchange and mutual understanding. In addition to this, more visitors from other countries would encourage local tourism, which could increase tax revenues especially in those tourism-focused countries. As a result, governments would have more disposable funds to invest into basic fields, such as education, health insurance and infracture.

 

On the other hand, it is undeniable that air-tranportation makes a lot of problems for environment. Basically, airplanes consume a vast amount of oil and the gas emission generated by an airplane is enormous. This cause grievous air pollution and exhaustion of natural resources. If cheap air tickets are not carefully controlled, the environmental impacts would only get worse in the long run. However, the increase of air-fares to restrict travel are not appropriate. Because I believe even if they do not travel by air, they would also travel by other vehicles. So air pollution is not the matter of what kind of transform they use.

 

In conclusion, it seems to me that lifting up the costs of air travel to reduce the impact on the environment is unreasonable. We need to admit that air travel, indeed, brings a great number of benefits to human being and need to find another effective solution.

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã hỏi trong Opinion bởi (0 điểm)
share bài về Wall để xem lại ===>

Xin vui lòng đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để góp ý bài viết này.

1 góp ý

0 phiếu

It is true that cheap air travel brings populace numerous benefits. While a number of people believe that, due to  environmental problemsthe air travel should be more expensive in order to restricted people from traveling by air as it will cause environmental problems, I would argue that this doing thinking is unrealistic.

On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why low-budget flights should be greatly stimulated encouraged. First of all, cheap air flights enable make long-distance travel affordable for ordinary people. Therefore, the there are more tourists take air planes to other countries, the more they have opportunities to understand deeply from different cultures. In other words, it would promote cultural exchange and mutual understanding. In addition to this, more visitors from other countries would encourage local tourism, which could increase tax revenues especially in those tourism-focused countries. As a result, governments would have more disposable funds to invest into basic fields, such as education, health insurance and infrastructure.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that air-tranportation makes causes a lot of problems for to environment. Basically, airplanes consume a vast amount of oil and the gas emission generated by an airplane is enormous. This causes grievous air pollution and exhaustion of natural resources. If cheap air tickets are not carefully controlled, the environmental impacts would only get worse in the long run. However, the increase of raising air-fares to restrict travel are is not appropriate because I believe even if they do not travel by air, they would also travel by planes can always be replaced by other vehicles for traveling. So air pollution still occurs no matter what kind of means of transportation used.

In conclusion, it seems to me that lifting up the costs of air travel to reduce the impact on the environment is unreasonable. We need to admit that air travel, indeed, brings a great number of benefits to human beings and need to find another effective solution.

Theo bạn, bài viết này được bao nhiêu "chấm" ?
đã góp ý bởi (443 điểm)

Tips: Thành viên với 10 points trở lên sẽ được sửa bài bởi Team Writing 7.5 :)
Bắt đầu nhận xét ở mục "Bài chưa có góp ý" để bắt đầu kiếm point nhé :)

Tham khảo các bài viết tương tự

1 góp ý
đã hỏi 27 Tháng 7, 2016 trong Opinion bởi packmun (0 điểm)
...