Topic : Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivities for instance in the zoo. Other people say that there are benefits for these animals and human. Discuss both sides of this debate and give your personal view.
Many years ago, meeting demand for entertainment, education of people, a large number of zoos built rapidly. Many people believe that animals should live in nature while others think Wildlife Park brings a tremendous amount of benefit for both them and human. Those arguments are challenging issue and have both advantages and disadvantages.
Firstly, there is no denying that zoos play an important role in wildlife conservation. As statistics suggest, the number of wild animals in danger of extinction is increasing rapidly due to many reasons such as changing environment, an encroaching forest of the human. Therefore, zoos are useful places where many scientists study and remain breeds of rare animals. In addition, no sooner had zoos built than a large number of people had jobs such as zookeeper. Moreover, especially, children could learn about nature and wildlife, which is the way to teach them protect the environment and prohibit all acts of hunting animals.
However, many people argue that animals should live in a natural environment instead of any captivity because those places will make them lose their instinct such as hunting food. It would be better to save endangered species by protecting their natural habitats. Besides, we have no right to use animals for entertainment. As newspapers show that, many enterprises build zoos with the aim of making a profit instead of protecting and developing in careful standards.
In conclusion, I am in favor that we should keep animals in zoos because it brings many effective aspects of researching, protecting and developing endangered species.